browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 757Declaring the office of Speaker of the House of Representatives to be vacant.

Congress 118

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors (0)

No sponsorships on file.

Action timeline (11)
  1. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  2. · H37100 On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 210 (Roll No. 519). (text: CR H4969)
  3. · 8000 Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 210 (Roll No. 519). (text: CR H4969)
  4. · H35000 The previous question was ordered without objection.
  5. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 757.
  6. · H36510 On motion to table the measure Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 208 - 218 (Roll no. 518).
  7. · H36500 Mr. Cole moved to table the measure. (consideration: CR H4969)
  8. · H30000 Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H4969-4978)
  9. · H8D000 QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Mr. Gaetz rose to a question of the privileges of the House and offered the resolution. The Chair directed the Clerk to report the resolution. Upon examination of the resolution, the Chair determined that the resolution did constitute a question of the privileges of the House.
  10. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  11. · 1000 Introduced in House
Text versions (1)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (2)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 2 outbound, grouped by type.

cited in report (2)
datedirentityamountrolesource
RL30857crs-report-relatedMaterials
R44243crs-report-relatedMaterials
Who matters on this bill
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

358 predicted yes (39%) · 540 predicted no (59%) · 10 unknown (2%)

By party: · R: 179 yes / 277 no / 5 unknown · D: 178 yes / 260 no / 5 unknown · I: 1 yes / 3 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50
Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-23 · Cited in GAO report RL30857 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
  2. 2026-05-23 · Cited in GAO report R44243 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.