HB 508 — Public Safety - Police Accountability - Investigation Records Relating to Not Administratively Charged, Unfounded, and Exonerated Complaints
MD 2026RS session · introduced 2026-01-27
Requiring that certain investigation records relating to a complaint of misconduct by a police officer be removed from the police officer's personnel record 3 years after an administrative charging committee issues a determination not to administratively charge the police officer in connection with the complaint or a trial board issues a finding of unfounded or exonerated in connection with the complaint.
Latest action: — In the House - Hearing 2/24 at 1:00 p.m.
Sponsors (15)
- Kevin B. Hornberger (R, MD-35) — sponsor · 2026-01-27
- Christopher T. Adams (R, MD-37) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Steven J. Arentz (R, MD-36) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Lauren Arikan (R, MD-7) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Terry L. Baker (R, MD-1) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Jason C. Buckel (R, MD-1) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Brian Chisholm (R, MD-31) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Barrie S. Ciliberti (R, MD-4) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Robin L. Grammer (R, MD-6) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Mike Griffith (R, MD-35) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Thomas S. Hutchinson (R, MD-37) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Jay A. Jacobs (R, MD-36) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Teresa E. Reilly (R, MD-35) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- Stuart Michael Schmidt (R, MD-33) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
- William Valentine (R, MD-2) — cosponsor · 2026-01-27
Action timeline (2)
- · house — First Reading
- · house — Hearing — Judiciary
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
referred to committee (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | House judiciary | — | md-leg |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kevin B. Hornberger (R, state_lower MD-35) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Barrie S. Ciliberti (R, state_lower MD-4) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Brian Chisholm (R, state_lower MD-31) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Christopher T. Adams (R, state_lower MD-37) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Jason C. Buckel (R, state_lower MD-1) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Jay A. Jacobs (R, state_lower MD-36) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Lauren Arikan (R, state_lower MD-7) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | Mike Griffith (R, state_lower MD-35) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 9 | Robin L. Grammer (R, state_lower MD-6) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 10 | Steven J. Arentz (R, state_lower MD-36) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 11 | Stuart Michael Schmidt (R, state_lower MD-33) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 12 | Teresa E. Reilly (R, state_lower MD-35) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 13 | Terry L. Baker (R, state_lower MD-1) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 14 | Thomas S. Hutchinson (R, state_lower MD-37) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 15 | William Valentine (R, state_lower MD-2) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-24 · was referred to House judiciary · md-leg