browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HB 593Criminal Law - Interference With Critical Infrastructure or a Public Safety Answering Point

MD 2026RS session · introduced 2026-01-28

Prohibiting a person from intentionally, willfully, and without authorization committing a certain act with the intent to interrupt or impair the functioning of critical infrastructure; providing that a person convicted of violating the Act is guilty of a felony and is subject to imprisonment of up to 10 years or a fine not to exceed $50,000, or both; etc.

Latest action: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 521

Sponsors (5)
Action timeline (9)
  1. · house First Reading
  2. · house Hearing — Judiciary
  3. · house Second Reading — Passed
  4. · senate First Reading (cross-filed)
  5. · house Third Reading — Passed
  6. · house Committee Report — Favorable
  7. · senate Second Reading — Passed
  8. · senate Third Reading — Passed
  9. · senate Committee Report — Favorable
Text versions (0)

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 2 outbound, grouped by type.

referred to committee (2)
datedirentityamountrolesource
Senate judicial proceedingsmd-leg
House judiciarymd-leg
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Terri L. Hill (D, state_lower MD-12)sponsor05
2Gabriel M. Moreno (D, state_lower MD-13)cosponsor01
3Pam Lanman Guzzone (D, state_lower MD-13)cosponsor01
4Regina T. Boyce (D, state_lower MD-43)cosponsor01
5Stephanie Smith (D, state_lower MD-45)cosponsor01
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-24 · was referred to Senate judicial proceedings · md-leg
  2. 2026-05-24 · was referred to House judiciary · md-leg
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.