browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HB 1506Condominiums and Homeowners Associations - New Owner Fees - Limitations

MD 2026RS session · introduced 2026-02-13

Limiting the amount that a condominium or homeowners association may charge a new unit or lot owner, other than an initial unit or lot owner, as an initial capital contribution or similar fee paid by the new owner at closing to be not more than three times the amount of monthly assessments paid by an existing unit or lot owner at the time of the closing; requiring certain documents to include certain fees; exempting certain condominiums and homeowner associations from a limit on a certain initial capital contribution or similar fee; etc.

Latest action: In the Senate - Hearing 4/03 at 1:00 p.m.

Sponsors (1)
Action timeline (7)
  1. · house First Reading
  2. · senate First Reading (cross-filed)
  3. · house Second Reading — Passed with Amendments
  4. · house Third Reading — Passed
  5. · house Hearing — Economic Matters
  6. · house Committee Report — Favorable with Amendments
  7. · senate Hearing — Judicial Proceedings
Text versions (0)

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 2 outbound, grouped by type.

referred to committee (2)
datedirentityamountrolesource
Senate judicial proceedingsmd-leg
House economic mattersmd-leg
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Kim Ross (D, state_lower MD-8)sponsor05
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-24 · was referred to Senate judicial proceedings · md-leg
  2. 2026-05-24 · was referred to House economic matters · md-leg
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.