SRES 203 — A resolution expressing support for the designation of May 2025 as "Renewable Fuels Month" to recognize the important role that renewable fuels play in reducing carbon impacts, lowering fuel prices for consumers, supporting rural communities, and lessening reliance on foreign adversaries.
Congress 119 · introduced 2025-05-05
Latest action: — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S2759)
Sponsors (1)
- Ricketts, Pete (R, NE-S) — sponsor · 2025-05-05
Action timeline (2)
- — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S2759)
- · 10000 — Introduced in Senate
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in Senate · 2025-05-05 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 0 outbound, grouped by type.
sponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-05 | ← | Ricketts, Pete | — | sponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ricketts, Pete (R, senate NE) | sponsor | 9 | — | 10 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pearson & associates | 0 | $0 | 106 | $225,754 | $225,754 |
| 2 | s-3 group | 0 | $0 | 37 | $69,850 | $69,850 |
| 3 | holtzman vogel, pllc | 0 | $0 | 18 | $62,100 | $62,100 |
| 4 | u.s. travel association | 0 | $0 | 6 | $46,290 | $46,290 |
| 5 | bp | 0 | $0 | 12 | $31,200 | $31,200 |
| 6 | retired | 0 | $0 | 12 | $17,334 | $17,334 |
| 7 | bunge north america pac | 0 | $0 | 7 | $15,800 | $15,800 |
| 8 | edw. c levy co | 0 | $0 | 1 | $14,040 | $14,040 |
| 9 | state of tennessee | 0 | $0 | 1 | $14,000 | $14,000 |
| 10 | the windquest group | 0 | $0 | 2 | $14,000 | $14,000 |
| 11 | deloitte pac | 0 | $0 | 5 | $11,500 | $11,500 |
| 12 | elliott investment management | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 13 | charles potomac capital, llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 14 | perceptive advisors | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 15 | cumberland development | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 16 | eagle const. talon development | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 17 | state of nebraska | 0 | $0 | 3 | $9,500 | $9,500 |
| 18 | open ai | 0 | $0 | 3 | $9,250 | $9,250 |
| 19 | family foundation | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 20 | a priori | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 21 | continuum ventures | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 22 | fisher investments | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 23 | carolyn rowan collection llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 24 | ceo | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 25 | diamondbacks | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
1 predicted yes (0%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 276 unknown (51%)
By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Ricketts, Pete (R · senate · NE) · sponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2025-05-05 · sponsored by Ricketts, Pete (sponsor) · sponsorship