pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HJRES 75 — Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Refrigerators, Freezers, and Refrigerator-Freezers".

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-03-10

Latest action: — Became Public Law No: 119-9.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  2. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 — Introduced in House
  4. · H1L210 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 242 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 24, H.J. Res. 75 and H.R. 1048. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 24 and H.J. Res. 75 under a closed rule, and provides for consideration of H.R. 1048 under a structured rule. Also, the resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each measure.
  5. · H8D000 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 75, the Chair put the question on passage of the joint resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  6. · H35000 — The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  7. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 75.
  8. · H8D000 — Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 24, H.J. Res. 75 and H.R. 1048. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 24 and H.J. Res. 75 under a closed rule, and provides for consideration of H.R. 1048 under a structured rule. Also, the resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each measure.
  9. · H30000 — Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 242. (consideration: CR H1284-1290)
  10. · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  11. · H37100 — On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 193 (Roll no. 78). (text: 3/26/2024 CR H1284)
  12. · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 193 (Roll no. 78). (text: 3/26/2024 CR H1284)
  13. · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1312)
  14. — Received in the Senate, read twice.
  15. — Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S2683, S2695-2696: 1)
  16. — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 46. Record Vote Number: 224.
  17. — Message on Senate action sent to the House.
  18. — Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 45. Record Vote Number: 228. (consideration: CR S2726-2727: 1)
  19. · 17000 — Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 45. Record Vote Number: 228.
  20. · E20000 — Presented to President.
  21. · 28000 — Presented to President.
  22. · E40000 — Became Public Law No: 119-9.
  23. · 36000 — Became Public Law No: 119-9.
  24. · E30000 — Signed by President.
  25. · 36000 — Signed by President.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (2)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
—Lawler, Michaelcosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
2025-03-10Goldman, Craig A.sponsor_of_bill—sponsorsponsorship

Outbound (1)

datetypetoamountrolesource
2025-01-03referred_to_committeeHouse Energy and Commerce Committee—congress-committee

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Goldman, Craig A. (R, house TX-12)sponsor2—7
2Lawler, Michael (R, house NY-17)cosponsor1—2

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$031$7,230$7,230
2castle harlan, inc.0$01$7,000$7,000
3berenson partners, llc.0$01$3,643$3,643
4thirdpoint llc0$01$3,500$3,500
5ohio machinery co.0$01$3,500$3,500
6northwell health0$02$3,000$3,000
7law offices of irina roller pllc0$01$2,500$2,500
8self employed0$04$2,266$2,266
9cordary inc.0$01$2,000$2,000
10regency centers0$01$1,500$1,500
11cammebys0$01$1,000$1,000
12katten0$01$1,000$1,000
13hellman management0$01$1,000$1,000
14suburban hospital alliance of nys0$01$1,000$1,000
15longbow public policy0$01$500$500
16berbromgt0$01$500$500
17nela realty llc0$01$500$500
18town of clarkstown0$01$250$250
19reliant parking0$01$250$250
20nys doccs - sing sing0$01$200$200
21new york police department0$01$150$150
22town of orangetown0$02$150$150
239606 capital0$01$104$104
24thompson bender0$01$100$100
25westchester county0$01$100$100

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

106 predicted yes (17%) · 309 predicted no (48%) · 226 unknown (35%)

By party: · R: 106 yes / 0 no / 223 unknown · D: 0 yes / 304 no / 3 unknown · I: 0 yes / 5 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Lawler, Michael (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2025-03-10 · sponsored by Goldman, Craig A. (sponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Energy and Commerce Committee · congress-committee

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.

Want to partner? Contact us.