HR 288 — Separation of Powers Restoration Act of 2023

Congress 118

Latest action: — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Action timeline

2023-01-11 · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
2023-01-11 · Intro-H — Introduced in House
2023-01-11 · 1000 — Introduced in House
2023-05-10 — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 5.
2023-05-10 — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
2023-06-01 · H12410 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 60.
2023-06-01 · H12200 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-83.
2023-06-01 · 5000 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-83.
2023-06-05 · H1L210 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 463 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. R. 277 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 288 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 1615 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; and H. R. 1640 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate. One motion to recommit on each measure.
2023-06-12 · H1L210 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 495 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table.
2023-06-15 · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2023-06-15 · H37100 — On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 211 (Roll no. 271).
2023-06-15 · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 211 (Roll no. 271).
2023-06-15 · H36210 — On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 220 (Roll no. 270).
2023-06-15 · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2944-2945)
2023-06-15 · H8D000 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. R. 288, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Dean (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2023-06-15 · H8A000 — The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
2023-06-15 · H36200 — Ms. Dean (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H2944)
2023-06-15 · H35000 — The previous question was ordered on the amendment and the bill pursuant to the rule.
2023-06-15 · H8D000 — DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 1.
2023-06-15 · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 288.
2023-06-15 · H8D000 — Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615 and H.R. 1640. The resolution provides for consideration of H. J. Res. 44 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and H.R. 277, H.R. 288, H.R. 1615, and H.R. 1640 under structured rules with one hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed on each measure. The resolution also provides that the ordering of the yeas and nays on the question of reconsideration of the vote on adoption of H. Res. 463 be considered vacated and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table.
2023-06-15 · H30000 — Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 495. (consideration: CR H2938-2944; text: CR H2938-2939)
2023-06-20 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Text versions

Introduced in House · 2023-01-11 — open
Reported in House · 2023-06-01 — open
Engrossed in House · 2023-06-15 — open
Referred in Senate · 2023-06-20 — open

Connected on the graph

Inbound (7)

date	from	type	amount	role	source
—	Bishop, Dan	cosponsor_of_bill	—	cosponsor	sponsorship
—	Burgess, Michael C.	cosponsor_of_bill	—	cosponsor	sponsorship
—	Tiffany, Thomas P.	cosponsor_of_bill	—	cosponsor	sponsorship
—	Buck, Ken	cosponsor_of_bill	—	cosponsor	sponsorship
—	Hageman, Harriet M.	cosponsor_of_bill	—	cosponsor	sponsorship
—	McClintock, Tom	cosponsor_of_bill	—	cosponsor	sponsorship
2023-01-11	Fitzgerald, Scott	sponsor_of_bill	—	sponsor	sponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#	Member	Role	Speeches	Voted	Score
1	Fitzgerald, Scott (R, house WI-5)	sponsor	2	—	7
2	McClintock, Tom (R, house CA-5)	cosponsor	2	—	3
3	Hageman, Harriet M. (R, house WY)	cosponsor	1	—	2
4	Bishop, Dan (R, house NC-8)	cosponsor	0	—	1
5	Buck, Ken (R, house CO-4)	cosponsor	0	—	1
6	Burgess, Michael C. (R, house TX-26)	cosponsor	0	—	1
7	Tiffany, Thomas P. (R, house WI-7)	cosponsor	0	—	1

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#	Org	LDA spend	Donor employees	Employee donations	Total
1	blackstone	$0	1	$10,500	$10,500
2	none	$0	4	$8,550	$8,550
3	o'neill enterprises	$0	1	$3,500	$3,500
4	retired	$0	3	$3,051	$3,051
5	harbinger strategies	$0	2	$2,500	$2,500
6	mesirow	$0	1	$1,300	$1,300
7	lsv	$0	1	$1,300	$1,300
8	self	$0	1	$1,000	$1,000
9	earl construction company	$0	1	$250	$250

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

4 predicted yes (1%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 273 unknown (50%)

By party: · R: 4 yes / 0 no / 273 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

4 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Fitzgerald, Scott (R · house · WI-5) · sponsor
Hageman, Harriet M. (R · house · WY) · cosponsor
McClintock, Tom (R · house · CA-5) · cosponsor
Tiffany, Thomas P. (R · house · WI-7) · cosponsor

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Burgess, Michael C. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
2026-05-17 · cosponsored by McClintock, Tom (cosponsor) · sponsorship
2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Hageman, Harriet M. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Buck, Ken (cosponsor) · sponsorship
2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Bishop, Dan (cosponsor) · sponsorship
2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Tiffany, Thomas P. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
2023-01-11 · sponsored by Fitzgerald, Scott (sponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.