pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 6260Keeping Violent Offenders Off Our Streets Act of 2025

Congress 119

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 Introduced in House
  4. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 9.
  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  6. · H12410 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 521.
  7. · H12200 Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-601.
  8. · 5000 Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-601.
  9. · H1L210 Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1275 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
  10. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  11. · H37100 On passage Passed by recorded vote: 243 - 179 (Roll no. 169). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3474)
  12. · 8000 Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 243 - 179 (Roll no. 169). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3474)
  13. · H36210 On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 213 (Roll no. 168).
  14. · H30000 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3505-3506)
  15. · H8D000 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 6260, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Raskin demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  16. · H8A000 The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
  17. · H36200 Mr. Raskin moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H3478-3480)
  18. · H35000 The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  19. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 6260.
  20. · H8D000 Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
  21. · H30000 Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275. (consideration: CR H3474-3480)

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (6)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Wied, Tonycosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-13Moore, Timcosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2025-12-18Tiffany, Thomas P.cosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2025-11-21Fitzgerald, Scottsponsor_of_billsponsorsponsorship
2025-11-21Steil, Bryancosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2025-11-21Roy, Chipcosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Fitzgerald, Scott (R, house WI-5)sponsor27
2Moore, Tim (R, house NC-14)cosponsor12
3Wied, Tony (R, house WI-8)cosponsor12
4Roy, Chip (R, house TX-21)cosponsor01
5Steil, Bryan (R, house WI-1)cosponsor01
6Tiffany, Thomas P. (R, house WI-7)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$037$14,726$14,726
2blackstone0$01$10,500$10,500
3precision walls0$01$7,000$7,000
4self-employed0$04$5,668$5,668
5crete solutions, llc0$01$3,500$3,500
6o'neill enterprises0$01$3,500$3,500
7hal leonard llc0$01$3,500$3,500
8harbinger strategies0$02$2,500$2,500
9epic systems corporation0$01$2,500$2,500
10cbre0$01$2,143$2,143
11sss education, inc.0$01$2,143$2,143
12mesirow0$01$1,300$1,300
13lsv0$01$1,300$1,300
14self0$03$1,276$1,276
15rtp company0$01$1,000$1,000
16tif0$01$1,000$1,000
17riley outdoor0$01$1,000$1,000
18blockchain association0$01$1,000$1,000
19goolsby currin0$01$1,000$1,000
20empire property0$01$500$500
21wi souvenir milkcaps0$01$500$500
22hamilton stephens0$01$500$500
23mlwk south/racine ascenion wisconsin0$01$500$500
24wells fargo0$01$500$500
25not employed0$01$250$250

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

453 predicted yes (47%) · 445 predicted no (46%) · 75 unknown (7%)

By party: · R: 210 yes / 213 no / 71 unknown · D: 242 yes / 229 no / 4 unknown · I: 1 yes / 3 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Wied, Tony (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-01-13 · cosponsored by Moore, Tim (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2025-12-18 · cosponsored by Tiffany, Thomas P. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2025-11-21 · cosponsored by Steil, Bryan (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  5. 2025-11-21 · sponsored by Fitzgerald, Scott (sponsor) · sponsorship
  6. 2025-11-21 · cosponsored by Roy, Chip (cosponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.