pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 6409 — FENCES Act

Congress 119

Latest action: — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Sponsors

No sponsorships on file.

Lobbied by (3)

LDA filings that named this bill in their activity descriptions. The lobbying firm (registrant) is paid by the client to lobby on this and related issues.

FilingPeriodRegistrant (lobbying firm)ClientIncomeMatched
1st Quarter - Report2026 first_quarterVAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATESPORT TAMPA BAY$20,000H.R.6409
1st Quarter - Report2026 first_quarterAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITYAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY—H.R. 6409
1st Quarter - Report2026 first_quarterAMERICAN CEMENT ASSOCIATION (FORMERLY PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION)PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION—H.R.6409

Action timeline

  1. — Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment.
  2. · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  3. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  4. · 1000 — Introduced in House
  5. — Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 11.
  6. — Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  7. — Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 22.
  8. — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  9. · H12410 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 514.
  10. · H12200 — Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-594.
  11. · 5000 — Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-594.
  12. · H12210 — Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Energy and Commerce, H. Rept. 119-594, Part II.
  13. · 5000 — Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Energy and Commerce, H. Rept. 119-594, Part II.
  14. · H8D000 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 6409, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit, and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Min demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  15. · H8A000 — The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
  16. · H36200 — Mr. Min moved to recommit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. (text: CR H2908-2909)
  17. · H35000 — The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  18. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 6409.
  19. · H8D000 — Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, H.R. 6409 and H. Res. 1156. The resolution provides for consideration of each measure under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides one motion to recommit on H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, and H.R. 6409.
  20. · H30000 — Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1174. (consideration: CR H2902-2909; text: CR H2902-2903)
  21. · H1L210 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1174 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, H.R. 6409 and H. Res. 1156. The resolution provides for consideration of each measure under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides one motion to recommit on H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, and H.R. 6409.
  22. · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  23. · H37100 — On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 208 (Roll no. 116).
  24. · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 208 (Roll no. 116).
  25. · H36210 — On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 215 (Roll no. 115).
  26. · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2937-2938)
  27. — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (3)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
2026-01-01PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATIONlobbies_on_bill—H.R.6409lobbying_bill_mention
2026-01-01AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITYlobbies_on_bill—H.R. 6409lobbying_bill_mention
2026-01-01PORT TAMPA BAYlobbies_on_bill—H.R.6409lobbying_bill_mention

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1PORT TAMPA BAY1$20,0000$0$20,000

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

433 predicted yes (44%) · 535 predicted no (55%) · 6 unknown (1%)

By party: · R: 213 yes / 275 no / 6 unknown · D: 219 yes / 257 no · I: 1 yes / 3 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-01-01 · lobbied on by PORT TAMPA BAY (h.r.6409) · lobbying_bill_mention
  2. 2026-01-01 · lobbied on by PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION (h.r.6409) · lobbying_bill_mention
  3. 2026-01-01 · lobbied on by AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY (h.r. 6409) · lobbying_bill_mention

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.