pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 7892No Aid for Ghost Students Act of 2026

Congress 119 · introduced 2026-03-12

Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 30 - 3.

Sponsors

Lobbied by (2)

LDA filings that named this bill in their activity descriptions. The lobbying firm (registrant) is paid by the client to lobby on this and related issues.

FilingPeriodRegistrant (lobbying firm)ClientIncomeMatched
1st Quarter - Amendment2026 first_quarterTHE CORMAC GROUP, LLCBM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$20,000H.R.7892
1st Quarter - Report2026 first_quarterLEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLCUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE$40,000H.R. 7892

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
  2. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 Introduced in House
  4. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 30 - 3.
  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (5)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Kiley, Kevincosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Foxx, Virginiacosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-03-12Owens, Burgesssponsor_of_billsponsorsponsorship
2026-01-01UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRElobbies_on_billH.R. 7892lobbying_bill_mention
2026-01-01BM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.lobbies_on_billH.R.7892lobbying_bill_mention

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Owens, Burgess (R, house UT-4)sponsor05
2Kiley, Kevin (I, house CA-3)cosponsor12
3Foxx, Virginia (R, house NC-5)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE1$40,0000$0$40,000
2BM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.1$20,0000$0$20,000
3retired0$0191$19,678$19,678
4patterson fan company0$01$3,500$3,500
5sullivan & worcester0$01$2,500$2,500
6odin construction solutions0$01$2,330$2,330
7state of california0$02$2,250$2,250
8tech ventures manager inc0$01$1,000$1,000
9geist dunn corporation0$01$1,000$1,000
10aborn powers0$01$1,000$1,000
11self employed0$04$621$621
12farragut partners0$01$500$500
13gifford anderson plumbing0$01$500$500
14r.j. smith law office0$01$500$500
15homemaker0$02$350$350
16hearts 4 heroes0$01$350$350
17elliotts natural foods0$01$250$250
18ac dike co0$01$250$250
19lpg0$01$250$250
20sap0$01$250$250
21standard bearer machines, llc0$01$250$250
22generate:biomedicines0$01$250$250
23collins0$01$250$250
24none0$01$250$250
25byers gymnastics center0$01$200$200

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

5 predicted yes (1%) · 263 predicted no (48%) · 275 unknown (51%)

By party: · R: 2 yes / 0 no / 275 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 3 yes / 0 no

3 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Foxx, Virginia (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Kiley, Kevin (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-03-12 · sponsored by Owens, Burgess (sponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2026-01-01 · lobbied on by BM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (h.r.7892) · lobbying_bill_mention
  5. 2026-01-01 · lobbied on by UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (h.r. 7892) · lobbying_bill_mention

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.