pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 906Foreign Adversary Communications Transparency Act

Congress 119

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Sponsors

Lobbied by (1)

LDA filings that named this bill in their activity descriptions. The lobbying firm (registrant) is paid by the client to lobby on this and related issues.

FilingPeriodRegistrant (lobbying firm)ClientIncomeMatched
1st Quarter - Report2026 first_quarterCOMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATIONCOMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATIONH.R. 906

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  2. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 Introduced in House
  4. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  6. · H12410 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 50.
  7. · H12200 Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-73.
  8. · 5000 Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-73.
  9. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  10. · H37300 On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1665)
  11. · 8000 Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1665)
  12. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 906.
  13. · H30000 Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1665-1666)
  14. · H30300 Mr. Bilirakis moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
  15. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (2)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Castor, Kathycosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-01COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATIONlobbies_on_billH.R. 906lobbying_bill_mention

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Castor, Kathy (D, house FL-14)cosponsor12

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1not employed0$011$6,575$6,575
2self0$02$1,025$1,025
3n/a0$01$1,000$1,000
4morgan stanley0$01$500$500
5joseph l. caballero cpa / eroc advisor0$01$500$500
6bgr group0$01$300$300
7mcbreen & nowak p.a.0$01$250$250
8university of south florida0$01$100$100
9allen dell pa0$01$35$35
10inphynet/usf0$01$25$25
11none0$01$25$25
12foi0$01$25$25
13pediatric health choice0$01$25$25
14electric supply inc.0$01$25$25
15tampa general hospital0$01$25$25
16interbay market0$01$20$20
17retired0$01$10$10

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

1 predicted yes (0%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 262 unknown (48%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 1 yes / 0 no / 262 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Castor, Kathy (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-01-01 · lobbied on by COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION (h.r. 906) · lobbying_bill_mention

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.