pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 114In the matter of George Santos.

Congress 118

Latest action: NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Robert Garcia (CA) notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
  2. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 Introduced in House
  4. · H8D000 NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Robert Garcia (CA) notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.
  5. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  6. · H36210 On motion to refer Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 204, 7 Present ) (Roll No. 217).
  7. · H8A000 The previous question on the motion to refer was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H2401)
  8. · H36700 Mr. D'Esposito moved to refer to Ethics.
  9. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 114.
  10. · H30000 Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2401; text: CR H2401)
  11. · H8D000 QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Mr. Robert Garcia (CA) rose to a question of the privileges of the House and offered the resolution. The Chair directed the Clerk to report the resolution. Upon examination of the resolution, the Chair determined that the resolution did constitute a question of the privileges of the House.
  12. · H8D000 NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Robert Garcia (CA) notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (6)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Blumenauer, Earlcosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Takano, Markcosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheilacosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Bush, Coricosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Eshoo, Anna G.cosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Thanedar, Shricosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Takano, Mark (D, house CA-39)cosponsor12
2Blumenauer, Earl (D, house OR-3)cosponsor01
3Bush, Cori (D, house MO-1)cosponsor01
4Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila (D, house FL-20)cosponsor01
5Eshoo, Anna G. (D, house CA-16)cosponsor01
6Thanedar, Shri (D, house MI-13)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1not employed0$016$50,155$50,155
2none0$013$14,500$14,500
3stone soup0$01$7,000$7,000
4krp0$01$7,000$7,000
5okare0$01$5,000$5,000
6the awad law firm p.c.0$01$5,000$5,000
7singleton shreiber llp0$01$3,500$3,500
8abdo0$01$3,500$3,500
9unitleader0$01$3,300$3,300
10casa0$01$3,000$3,000
11mercy health0$01$2,500$2,500
12self0$04$2,500$2,500
13oracle corporation0$01$2,500$2,500
14gsi0$01$2,000$2,000
15brown-kortkamp0$01$1,000$1,000
16northern va endocrinologists0$01$1,000$1,000
17strata equity global0$01$1,000$1,000
18merchant associates0$01$1,000$1,000
19ids real estate group0$01$1,000$1,000
20howard university0$01$1,000$1,000
21ba mgt0$01$1,000$1,000
22jm llc0$01$1,000$1,000
23mt washington pediatric hospit0$01$1,000$1,000
24burgan associates0$01$1,000$1,000
25and wealth partners0$01$1,000$1,000

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

3 predicted yes (1%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 260 unknown (47%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 3 yes / 0 no / 260 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

3 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Eshoo, Anna G. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Bush, Cori (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Blumenauer, Earl (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Thanedar, Shri (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  5. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Takano, Mark (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  6. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila (cosponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.

Want to partner? Contact us.