pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 119Declaring racism a public health crisis.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-02-06

Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  2. · H11100 Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  3. · H12100 Submitted in House

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (3)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheilacosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Jayapal, Pramilacosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2025-02-06Hayes, Jahanasponsor_of_billsponsorsponsorship

The full graph

Every typed relationship touching this entity — 3 edges across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.

Legislation

Cosponsored bill 2 edges

Sponsored bill 1 edge

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Hayes, Jahana (D, house CT-5)sponsor16
2Jayapal, Pramila (D, house WA-7)cosponsor34
3Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila (D, house FL-20)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1none0$013$14,500$14,500
2not employed0$0153$12,980$12,980
3self employed0$015$5,631$5,631
4singleton shreiber llp0$01$3,500$3,500
5unitleader0$01$3,300$3,300
6casa0$01$3,000$3,000
7self0$04$2,500$2,500
8howard university0$01$1,000$1,000
9merchant associates0$01$1,000$1,000
10jm llc0$01$1,000$1,000
11mt washington pediatric hospit0$01$1,000$1,000
12and wealth partners0$01$1,000$1,000
13strata equity global0$01$1,000$1,000
14google inc.0$01$600$600
15applovin0$01$500$500
16colrich0$01$500$500
17uua0$01$500$500
18hammond coldwell banker0$01$500$500
19c3 risk & insurance services0$01$500$500
20scribe strategies & advisors0$01$500$500
21mtnw0$01$500$500
22above all advertising0$01$500$500
23starbucks0$01$500$500
24microsoft0$03$310$310
25ruchika0$01$250$250

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

3 predicted yes (1%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 260 unknown (47%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 3 yes / 0 no / 260 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

3 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Jayapal, Pramila (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2025-02-06 · sponsored by Hayes, Jahana (sponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.