pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 488Denouncing the antisemitic terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-06-09

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  2. · H37300 On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 280 - 113, 6 Present (Roll no. 158). (text: CR H2542)
  3. · 8000 Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 280 - 113, 6 Present (Roll no. 158). (text: CR H2542)
  4. · H30000 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2558-2559)
  5. · H37220 At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
  6. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 488.
  7. · H30000 Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2542-2546)
  8. · H30300 Mr. Van Drew moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
  9. · H11100 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  10. · H11100 Submitted in House
  11. · 1025 Submitted in House

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (1)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Foxx, Virginiacosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship

Outbound (1)

datetypetoamountrolesource
2025-01-03referred_to_committeeHouse Judiciary Committeecongress-committee

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Foxx, Virginia (R, house NC-5)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1patterson fan company0$01$3,500$3,500
2sullivan & worcester0$01$2,500$2,500
3retired0$02$1,125$1,125
4geist dunn corporation0$01$1,000$1,000
5greenwich catholic school0$01$25$25

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

6 predicted yes (1%) · 263 predicted no (48%) · 274 unknown (51%)

By party: · R: 3 yes / 0 no / 274 unknown · D: 3 yes / 260 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

7 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Foxx, Virginia (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Judiciary Committee · congress-committee

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.

Estimated value: $540/mo per user — but we made it free.