pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HB 378An Act amending Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in child custody, further providing for factors to consider when awarding custody.

Congress · introduced 2025-01-28

Latest action: Act No. 11 of 2025, June 30, 2025

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · house Referred to JUDICIARY, Jan. 28, 2025
  2. · house Reported as committed, Feb. 4, 2025
  3. · house First consideration, Feb. 4, 2025
  4. · house Laid on the table, Feb. 4, 2025
  5. · house Removed from table, Feb. 5, 2025
  6. · house Second consideration, with amendments, May 5, 2025
  7. · house Re-committed to APPROPRIATIONS, May 5, 2025
  8. · house Re-reported as committed, May 6, 2025
  9. · house Third consideration and final passage, May 6, 2025 (202-1)
  10. · senate In the Senate
  11. · senate Referred to JUDICIARY, May 16, 2025
  12. · senate Reported as committed, June 23, 2025
  13. · senate First consideration, June 23, 2025
  14. · senate Second consideration, June 24, 2025
  15. · senate Third consideration and final passage, June 26, 2025 (50-0)
  16. · house Signed in House, June 30, 2025
  17. · senate Signed in Senate, June 30, 2025
  18. Presented to the Governor, June 30, 2025
  19. Approved by the Governor, June 30, 2025
  20. Act No. 11 of 2025, June 30, 2025
  21. · house (Remarks see House Journal Page 216-221), March 18, 2025
  22. · house (Remarks see House Journal Page 481-483), May 5, 2025
  23. · house (Remarks see House Journal Page 524-525), May 6, 2025

Text versions

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text

Printer's No. 0334 · 6,274 characters · source document

Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO.    334

                      THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA



                          HOUSE BILL
                          No. 378
                                                 Session of
                                                   2025

     INTRODUCED BY HANBIDGE, BRIGGS, KHAN, MAYES, KENYATTA, SANCHEZ,
        HILL-EVANS, GIRAL, BURGOS, CEPEDA-FREYTIZ, MALAGARI, DONAHUE,
        OTTEN, O'MARA, CERRATO AND GREEN, JANUARY 28, 2025

     REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, JANUARY 28, 2025


                                      AN ACT
 1   Amending Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania
 2      Consolidated Statutes, in child custody, further providing
 3      for factors to consider when awarding custody.
 4      The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
 5   hereby enacts as follows:
 6      Section 1.     Section 5328(a) of Title 23 of the Pennsylvania
 7   Consolidated Statutes, amended April 15, 2024 (P.L.24, No.8), is
 8   amended to read:
 9   § 5328.    Factors to consider when awarding custody.
10      (a)    Factors.--In ordering any form of custody, the court
11   shall determine the best interest of the child by considering
12   all relevant factors, giving substantial weighted consideration
13   to the factors specified under paragraphs (1), (2), (2.1) and
14   (2.2) which affect the safety of the child, including the
15   following:
16             (1)   Which party is more likely to ensure the safety of
17      the child.
18             (2)   The present and past abuse committed by a party or
 1    member of the party's household, which may include past or
 2    current protection from abuse or sexual violence protection
 3    orders where there has been a finding of abuse.
 4        (2.1)     The information set forth in section 5329.1(a)
 5    (relating to consideration of child abuse and involvement
 6    with protective services).
 7        (2.2)     Violent or assaultive behavior committed by a
 8    party.
 9        (2.3)     [Which party is more likely to encourage and
10    permit frequent and continuing contact between the child and
11    another party if contact is consistent with the safety needs
12    of the child.] The level of cooperation and conflict between
13    the parties, including:
14             (i)    which party is more likely to encourage and
15        permit frequent and continuing contact between the child
16        and the other party or parties if contact is consistent
17        with the safety needs of the child; and
18             (ii)    the attempts by a party to turn the child
19        against the other party, except in cases of abuse where
20        reasonable safety measures are necessary to protect the
21        safety of the child. A party's good faith and reasonable
22        effort to protect the safety of a child or self shall not
23        be considered evidence of unwillingness or inability to
24        cooperate with the other party. A party's reasonable
25        concerns for the safety of the child and the party's
26        reasonable efforts to protect the child shall not be
27        considered attempts to turn the child against the other
28        party. A child's deficient or negative relationship with
29        a party shall not be presumed to be caused by the other
30        party.

20250HB0378PN0334                  - 2 -
 1        (3)    [The parental duties performed by each party on
 2    behalf of the child.] A willingness and ability of a party to
 3    prioritize the needs of the child by providing appropriate
 4    care, stability and continuity for the child, considering the
 5    parental duties performed by the party on behalf of the child
 6    in the past and whether the party is willing and able to
 7    perform the duties in the future, and attend to the daily
 8    physical, emotional, developmental, educational and special
 9    needs of the child.
10        (4)    The need for stability and continuity in the child's
11    education, family life and community life, except if changes
12    are necessary to protect the safety of the child or a party.
13        [(5)    The availability of extended family.]
14        (6)    The child's sibling and other familial
15    relationships.
16        (7)    The well-reasoned preference of the child, based on
17    the child's developmental stage, maturity and judgment.
18        [(8)    The attempts of a party to turn the child against
19    the other party, except in cases of abuse where reasonable
20    safety measures are necessary to protect the safety of the
21    child. A party's reasonable concerns for the safety of the
22    child and the party's reasonable efforts to protect the child
23    shall not be considered attempts to turn the child against
24    the other party. A child's deficient or negative relationship
25    with a party shall not be presumed to be caused by the other
26    party.
27        (9)    Which party is more likely to maintain a loving,
28    stable, consistent and nurturing relationship with the child
29    adequate for the child's emotional needs.
30        (10)    Which party is more likely to attend to the daily

20250HB0378PN0334                 - 3 -
 1    physical, emotional, developmental, educational and special
 2    needs of the child.]
 3        (11)     The proximity of the residences of the parties.
 4        (12)     Each party's employment schedule and availability
 5    to care for the child or ability to make appropriate child-
 6    care arrangements.
 7        [(13)     The level of conflict between the parties and the
 8    willingness and ability of the parties to cooperate with one
 9    another. A party's effort to protect a child or self from
10    abuse by another party is not evidence of unwillingness or
11    inability to cooperate with that party.]
12        (14)     The history of drug or alcohol abuse of a party or
13    member of a party's household.
14        (15)     The mental and physical condition of a party or
15    member of a party's household.
16        (16)     Any other relevant factor.
17    * * *
18    Section 2.    This act shall take effect in 60 days.




20250HB0378PN0334                  - 4 -

Connected on the graph

Outbound (3)

datetypetoamountrolesource
referred_to_committeePennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committeepa-leg
referred_to_committeePennsylvania House Appropriations Committeepa-leg
referred_to_committeePennsylvania House Judiciary Committeepa-leg

The full graph

Every typed relationship touching this entity — 3 edges across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.

Committees

Referred to committee 3 edges

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Liz Hanbidge (D, state_lower PA-61)sponsor05
2Aerion Abney (D, state_lower PA-19)cosponsor01
3Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, state_lower PA-153)cosponsor01
4Carol Hill-Evans (D, state_lower PA-95)cosponsor01
5Danielle Friel Otten (D, state_lower PA-155)cosponsor01
6Danilo Burgos (D, state_lower PA-197)cosponsor01
7G. Roni Green (D, state_lower PA-190)cosponsor01
8Jennifer O'Mara (D, state_lower PA-165)cosponsor01
9Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (D, state_lower PA-129)cosponsor01
10Jose Giral (D, state_lower PA-180)cosponsor01
11Justin C. Fleming (D, state_lower PA-105)cosponsor01
12Keith S. Harris (D, state_lower PA-195)cosponsor01
13Kyle Donahue (D, state_lower PA-113)cosponsor01
14La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, state_lower PA-24)cosponsor01
15Malcolm Kenyatta (D, state_lower PA-181)cosponsor01
16Melissa Cerrato (D, state_lower PA-151)cosponsor01
17Melissa L. Shusterman (D, state_lower PA-157)cosponsor01
18Steven R. Malagari (D, state_lower PA-53)cosponsor01
19Tarik Khan (D, state_lower PA-194)cosponsor01
20Tim Briggs (D, state_lower PA-149)cosponsor01

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee · pa-leg
  2. 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Appropriations Committee · pa-leg
  3. 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee · pa-leg

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.