HB 378 — An Act amending Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in child custody, further providing for factors to consider when awarding custody.
Congress · introduced 2025-01-28
Latest action: — Act No. 11 of 2025, June 30, 2025
Sponsors
- Liz Hanbidge (D, PA-61) — sponsor · 2025-01-28
- Tim Briggs (D, PA-149) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Tarik Khan (D, PA-194) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, PA-24) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Malcolm Kenyatta (D, PA-181) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, PA-153) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Carol Hill-Evans (D, PA-95) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Jose Giral (D, PA-180) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Danilo Burgos (D, PA-197) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (D, PA-129) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Steven R. Malagari (D, PA-53) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Kyle Donahue (D, PA-113) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Danielle Friel Otten (D, PA-155) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Jennifer O'Mara (D, PA-165) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Melissa Cerrato (D, PA-151) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- G. Roni Green (D, PA-190) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Melissa L. Shusterman (D, PA-157) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Aerion Abney (D, PA-19) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Keith S. Harris (D, PA-195) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
- Justin C. Fleming (D, PA-105) — cosponsor · 2025-01-28
Action timeline
- · house — Referred to JUDICIARY, Jan. 28, 2025
- · house — Reported as committed, Feb. 4, 2025
- · house — First consideration, Feb. 4, 2025
- · house — Laid on the table, Feb. 4, 2025
- · house — Removed from table, Feb. 5, 2025
- · house — Second consideration, with amendments, May 5, 2025
- · house — Re-committed to APPROPRIATIONS, May 5, 2025
- · house — Re-reported as committed, May 6, 2025
- · house — Third consideration and final passage, May 6, 2025 (202-1)
- · senate — In the Senate
- · senate — Referred to JUDICIARY, May 16, 2025
- · senate — Reported as committed, June 23, 2025
- · senate — First consideration, June 23, 2025
- · senate — Second consideration, June 24, 2025
- · senate — Third consideration and final passage, June 26, 2025 (50-0)
- · house — Signed in House, June 30, 2025
- · senate — Signed in Senate, June 30, 2025
- — Presented to the Governor, June 30, 2025
- — Approved by the Governor, June 30, 2025
- — Act No. 11 of 2025, June 30, 2025
- · house — (Remarks see House Journal Page 216-221), March 18, 2025
- · house — (Remarks see House Journal Page 481-483), May 5, 2025
- · house — (Remarks see House Journal Page 524-525), May 6, 2025
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text
Printer's No. 0334 · 6,274 characters · source document
Read the full text
PRINTER'S NO. 334
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No. 378
Session of
2025
INTRODUCED BY HANBIDGE, BRIGGS, KHAN, MAYES, KENYATTA, SANCHEZ,
HILL-EVANS, GIRAL, BURGOS, CEPEDA-FREYTIZ, MALAGARI, DONAHUE,
OTTEN, O'MARA, CERRATO AND GREEN, JANUARY 28, 2025
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY, JANUARY 28, 2025
AN ACT
1 Amending Title 23 (Domestic Relations) of the Pennsylvania
2 Consolidated Statutes, in child custody, further providing
3 for factors to consider when awarding custody.
4 The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
5 hereby enacts as follows:
6 Section 1. Section 5328(a) of Title 23 of the Pennsylvania
7 Consolidated Statutes, amended April 15, 2024 (P.L.24, No.8), is
8 amended to read:
9 § 5328. Factors to consider when awarding custody.
10 (a) Factors.--In ordering any form of custody, the court
11 shall determine the best interest of the child by considering
12 all relevant factors, giving substantial weighted consideration
13 to the factors specified under paragraphs (1), (2), (2.1) and
14 (2.2) which affect the safety of the child, including the
15 following:
16 (1) Which party is more likely to ensure the safety of
17 the child.
18 (2) The present and past abuse committed by a party or
1 member of the party's household, which may include past or
2 current protection from abuse or sexual violence protection
3 orders where there has been a finding of abuse.
4 (2.1) The information set forth in section 5329.1(a)
5 (relating to consideration of child abuse and involvement
6 with protective services).
7 (2.2) Violent or assaultive behavior committed by a
8 party.
9 (2.3) [Which party is more likely to encourage and
10 permit frequent and continuing contact between the child and
11 another party if contact is consistent with the safety needs
12 of the child.] The level of cooperation and conflict between
13 the parties, including:
14 (i) which party is more likely to encourage and
15 permit frequent and continuing contact between the child
16 and the other party or parties if contact is consistent
17 with the safety needs of the child; and
18 (ii) the attempts by a party to turn the child
19 against the other party, except in cases of abuse where
20 reasonable safety measures are necessary to protect the
21 safety of the child. A party's good faith and reasonable
22 effort to protect the safety of a child or self shall not
23 be considered evidence of unwillingness or inability to
24 cooperate with the other party. A party's reasonable
25 concerns for the safety of the child and the party's
26 reasonable efforts to protect the child shall not be
27 considered attempts to turn the child against the other
28 party. A child's deficient or negative relationship with
29 a party shall not be presumed to be caused by the other
30 party.
20250HB0378PN0334 - 2 -
1 (3) [The parental duties performed by each party on
2 behalf of the child.] A willingness and ability of a party to
3 prioritize the needs of the child by providing appropriate
4 care, stability and continuity for the child, considering the
5 parental duties performed by the party on behalf of the child
6 in the past and whether the party is willing and able to
7 perform the duties in the future, and attend to the daily
8 physical, emotional, developmental, educational and special
9 needs of the child.
10 (4) The need for stability and continuity in the child's
11 education, family life and community life, except if changes
12 are necessary to protect the safety of the child or a party.
13 [(5) The availability of extended family.]
14 (6) The child's sibling and other familial
15 relationships.
16 (7) The well-reasoned preference of the child, based on
17 the child's developmental stage, maturity and judgment.
18 [(8) The attempts of a party to turn the child against
19 the other party, except in cases of abuse where reasonable
20 safety measures are necessary to protect the safety of the
21 child. A party's reasonable concerns for the safety of the
22 child and the party's reasonable efforts to protect the child
23 shall not be considered attempts to turn the child against
24 the other party. A child's deficient or negative relationship
25 with a party shall not be presumed to be caused by the other
26 party.
27 (9) Which party is more likely to maintain a loving,
28 stable, consistent and nurturing relationship with the child
29 adequate for the child's emotional needs.
30 (10) Which party is more likely to attend to the daily
20250HB0378PN0334 - 3 -
1 physical, emotional, developmental, educational and special
2 needs of the child.]
3 (11) The proximity of the residences of the parties.
4 (12) Each party's employment schedule and availability
5 to care for the child or ability to make appropriate child-
6 care arrangements.
7 [(13) The level of conflict between the parties and the
8 willingness and ability of the parties to cooperate with one
9 another. A party's effort to protect a child or self from
10 abuse by another party is not evidence of unwillingness or
11 inability to cooperate with that party.]
12 (14) The history of drug or alcohol abuse of a party or
13 member of a party's household.
14 (15) The mental and physical condition of a party or
15 member of a party's household.
16 (16) Any other relevant factor.
17 * * *
18 Section 2. This act shall take effect in 60 days.
20250HB0378PN0334 - 4 -Connected on the graph
Outbound (3)
| date | type | to | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee | — | pa-leg | |
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Appropriations Committee | — | pa-leg | |
| — | referred_to_committee | Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee | — | pa-leg |
The full graph
Every typed relationship touching this entity — 3 edges across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.
Committees
→ Referred to committee 3 edges
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liz Hanbidge (D, state_lower PA-61) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Aerion Abney (D, state_lower PA-19) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Benjamin V. Sanchez (D, state_lower PA-153) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Carol Hill-Evans (D, state_lower PA-95) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Danielle Friel Otten (D, state_lower PA-155) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Danilo Burgos (D, state_lower PA-197) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | G. Roni Green (D, state_lower PA-190) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | Jennifer O'Mara (D, state_lower PA-165) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 9 | Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (D, state_lower PA-129) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 10 | Jose Giral (D, state_lower PA-180) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 11 | Justin C. Fleming (D, state_lower PA-105) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 12 | Keith S. Harris (D, state_lower PA-195) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 13 | Kyle Donahue (D, state_lower PA-113) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 14 | La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, state_lower PA-24) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 15 | Malcolm Kenyatta (D, state_lower PA-181) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 16 | Melissa Cerrato (D, state_lower PA-151) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 17 | Melissa L. Shusterman (D, state_lower PA-157) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 18 | Steven R. Malagari (D, state_lower PA-53) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 19 | Tarik Khan (D, state_lower PA-194) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 20 | Tim Briggs (D, state_lower PA-149) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee · pa-leg
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Appropriations Committee · pa-leg
- 2026-05-20 · was referred to Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee · pa-leg