pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SRES 86A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) and the harmful conflation of China's "One China Principle" and the United States'"One China Policy".

Congress 119

Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 56.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1135-1136)
  2. · 10000 Introduced in Senate
  3. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
  4. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 56.
  5. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.
  6. · 14000 Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (5)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Ricketts, Petecosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Van Hollen, Chriscosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Kim, Andycosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Cortez Masto, Catherinecosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Sullivan, Dancosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship

Outbound (1)

datetypetoamountrolesource
2025-01-03referred_to_committeeSenate Foreign Relations Committeecongress-committee

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Cortez Masto, Catherine (D, senate NV)cosponsor34
2Ricketts, Pete (R, senate NE)cosponsor34
3Van Hollen, Chris (D, senate MD)cosponsor23
4Kim, Andy (D, senate NJ)cosponsor12
5Sullivan, Dan (R, senate AK)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1not employed0$0344$19,493$19,493
2retired0$049$17,618$17,618
3pearson & associates0$014$16,303$16,303
4u.s. travel association0$02$13,181$13,181
5s-3 group0$02$8,000$8,000
6csi aviation0$01$7,000$7,000
7herman dinklage inc0$01$7,000$7,000
8brightview senior living0$01$5,000$5,000
9barnes & thornburg0$01$3,500$3,500
10quick trip0$01$3,300$3,300
11apollo global management0$01$3,000$3,000
12ubs financial services, inc.0$01$3,000$3,000
13apollo0$01$3,000$3,000
14us government0$01$2,500$2,500
15public strategies washington0$01$2,500$2,500
16self employed0$08$2,410$2,410
17self0$04$2,040$2,040
18jp morgan0$01$2,000$2,000
19eaton steel bar company0$01$2,000$2,000
20brownstein hyatt farber schreck0$03$2,000$2,000
21tamaroff mts0$01$2,000$2,000
22premier realty michigan, llc0$01$2,000$2,000
23neale creek, llc0$01$2,000$2,000
24actumllc0$01$2,000$2,000
25holtzman vogel, pllc0$01$1,800$1,800

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

5 predicted yes (1%) · 3 predicted no (1%) · 535 unknown (98%)

By party: · R: 2 yes / 0 no / 275 unknown · D: 3 yes / 0 no / 260 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

5 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Ricketts, Pete (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Sullivan, Dan (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Van Hollen, Chris (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Kim, Andy (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  5. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Cortez Masto, Catherine (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  6. 2025-01-03 · was referred to Senate Foreign Relations Committee · congress-committee

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.