pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HB 2622Concerning comparison factors that must be considered in interest arbitration for correctional employees regarding wages, hours, and conditions of employment.

Congress · introduced 2026-01-22

AN ACT Relating to comparison factors that must be considered in interest arbitration for correctional employees regarding wages, hours, and conditions of employment;

Latest action: 2026-01-22 First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · house First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.

Text versions

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Connected on the graph

Inbound (9)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
2026-01-22Doglio, Bethcosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-22Eslick, Carolyncosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-22Fosse, Marycosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-22Goodman, Rogercosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-22Parshley, Lisacosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-22Peterson, Stromcosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-22Pollet, Gerrycosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-22Stuebe, Davidsponsor_of_billsponsorsponsorship
2026-01-22Zahn, Janicecosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Stuebe, David (R, state_lower WA-17)sponsor05
2Doglio, Beth (D, state_lower WA-22)cosponsor01
3Eslick, Carolyn (R, state_lower WA-39)cosponsor01
4Fosse, Mary (D, state_lower WA-38)cosponsor01
5Goodman, Roger (D, state_lower WA-45)cosponsor01
6Parshley, Lisa (D, state_lower WA-22)cosponsor01
7Peterson, Strom (D, state_lower WA-21)cosponsor01
8Pollet, Gerry (D, state_lower WA-46)cosponsor01
9Zahn, Janice (D, state_lower WA-41)cosponsor01

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-01-22 · cosponsored by Peterson, Strom (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-01-22 · cosponsored by Eslick, Carolyn (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-01-22 · cosponsored by Doglio, Beth (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2026-01-22 · cosponsored by Pollet, Gerry (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  5. 2026-01-22 · cosponsored by Goodman, Roger (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  6. 2026-01-22 · cosponsored by Parshley, Lisa (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  7. 2026-01-22 · cosponsored by Fosse, Mary (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  8. 2026-01-22 · sponsored by Stuebe, David (sponsor) · sponsorship
  9. 2026-01-22 · cosponsored by Zahn, Janice (cosponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.