SB 5972 — Expanding the definition of law enforcement personnel regarding correctional officers for purposes of interest arbitration.
Congress · introduced 2026-01-12
AN ACT Relating to expanding the definition of law enforcement personnel regarding correctional officers for purposes of interest arbitration;
Latest action: 2026-02-04 — 1st substitute bill substituted.
Sponsors
- Stanford, Derek (D, WA-1) — sponsor · 2026-01-12
- Conway, Steve (D, WA-29) — cosponsor · 2026-01-12
- Hasegawa, Bob (D, WA-11) — cosponsor · 2026-01-12
Action timeline
- · senate — Prefiled for introduction.
- · senate — First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.
- · senate — LC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
- · senate — Minority; do not pass.
- · senate — Minority; without recommendation.
- · senate — LC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
- · senate — Minority; do not pass.
- · senate — Minority; without recommendation.
- · senate — Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
- · senate — Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
- · senate — Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
- · senate — Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
- · senate — 1st substitute bill substituted.
- · senate — 1st substitute bill substituted.
- · senate — Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
- · senate — Third reading, passed; yeas, 34; nays, 15; absent, 0; excused, 0.
- · senate — First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards.
- · senate — LAWS - Executive action taken by committee.
- · senate — LAWS - Majority; do pass.
- · senate — Minority; without recommendation.
- · senate — Referred to Appropriations.
- · senate — APP - Executive action taken by committee.
- · senate — APP - Majority; do pass.
- · senate — Minority; do not pass.
- · senate — Referred to Rules 2 Review.
- · senate — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Connected on the graph
Inbound (3)
| date | from | type | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-12 | Conway, Steve | cosponsor_of_bill | — | cosponsor | sponsorship |
| 2026-01-12 | Hasegawa, Bob | cosponsor_of_bill | — | cosponsor | sponsorship |
| 2026-01-12 | Stanford, Derek | sponsor_of_bill | — | sponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stanford, Derek (D, state_upper WA-1) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Conway, Steve (D, state_upper WA-29) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Hasegawa, Bob (D, state_upper WA-11) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Activity
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.
- 2026-01-12 · cosponsored by Conway, Steve (cosponsor) · sponsorship
- 2026-01-12 · sponsored by Stanford, Derek (sponsor) · sponsorship
- 2026-01-12 · cosponsored by Hasegawa, Bob (cosponsor) · sponsorship