pac.dog pac.dog / Candidates

LOVE, MIA

R Β· house Β· bioguide L000584

Sign in to add to a watchlist β†’

FEC candidate id
H2UT04023
Internal id
3e41953e-1f65-4a0a-b93c-e5ac5deff836
Status
incumbent

Who this candidate represents

Who lives here β€” American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024), UT-04. Source.

CategoryMetricValue
PeoplePopulation872,486
PeopleMedian age31
IncomeMedian household income$106,578
IncomePer-capita income$38,699
IncomeIn poverty6.1%
IncomeUnemployed3.6%
IncomeGini inequality index0.372
RaceWhite alone76.5%
RaceBlack alone1.3%
RaceAsian alone2.6%
RaceHispanic or Latino17.3%
RaceTwo or more races11.2%
OriginForeign-born9.8%
LanguageSpeaks English only at home83.2%
LanguageSpeaks Spanish at home11.5%
EducationHigh school or higher58.1%
EducationBachelor's or higher35.6%
EducationAdvanced degree11.6%
HouseholdFamily households78.5%
HouseholdAvg household size3.24
HouseholdNever married (15+)29.9%
HousingMedian home value$508,500
HousingMedian gross rent$1,689
HousingSingle-family detached69.6%
HousingBuilt before 19401.3%
HousingOvercrowded (>1 per room)3.0%
HousingVacant units3.7%
ServiceVeterans (18+)3.6%
HealthWith a disability9.3%
ConnectivityHouseholds with broadband95.2%
ConnectivityHouseholds with no internet2.1%
CommuteDrove alone66.7%
CommutePublic transit1.2%
CommuteWorked from home19.1%

Cycle financials

Source: FEC weball bulk file (cycle summary). Numbers in USD; 0 = no activity reported.

CycleRaisedSpentCash on handDebtsIndiv. contribs.
2018$5,867,355$5,951,840$102,871$0$4,538,873
2016$5,472,751$5,576,208$187,357$0$4,138,956
2014$5,315,812$5,159,840$290,813$0$4,765,074
2012$2,505,284$2,370,444$134,841$0$1,969,032

Elections

Committees

Recent votes

No votes on file.

Sponsored & cosponsored bills

No sponsorships on file.

Election prediction

Cycle 2026 Β· model baseline-v1 Β· base rate 15.1%

P(win) = 99.0%

FeatureΞ” P(win)
Base rate (historical)15.1%
incumbent+78.0%
R (major party)+10.0%

Baseline model (incumbency Γ— party Γ— office). Calibration: backtest Brier score is the reference, see npm run db:ingest -- --source=predict-backtest-election. Future model versions must beat baseline Brier on the same held-out cohort or they don't ship.

Connected on the graph

Outbound (6)

datetypetoamountrolesource
β€”independent_committee_ofUTAH LOVE PACβ€”candidate_committees
β€”joint_fundraising_committee_ofUTAH LOVE JFCβ€”candidate_committees
β€”joint_fundraising_committee_ofCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT PROSPERITY AND FREE ENTERPRISEβ€”candidate_committees
β€”joint_fundraising_committee_ofYOUNG GUNS 2012 ROUND 1β€”candidate_committees
β€”joint_fundraising_committee_ofREPUBLICANS INSPIRING SUCCESS & EMPOWERMENT PROJECT (RISE PROJECT)β€”candidate_committees
β€”principal_candidate_ofUTAH LOVE PACβ€”candidate_committees

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission β€” no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user β€” but we made it free.