smh.com.au: https://www.smh.com.au/technology/musk-s-x-admits-breaking-australian-child-safety-law-fined-650-000-20260521-p5zze9.html

Speaker: —
Subject: J000289
Source: GDELT news · original
Published: Thursday, May 21, 2026

X legal battle: Elon Musk’s platform to pay $650,000 penalty in Australia for failing to report on child safety Open accessibility guide Skip to sections navigation Skip to content Skip to footer Log in Our network Log in Expand navigation menu Search The Sydney Morning Herald logo The Sydney Morning Herald logo Advertisement Breaking Technology Child abuse Musk’s X admits breaking Australian child safety law, fined $650,000 David Swan May 21, 2026 — 11:55am Save You have reached your maximum number of saved items. Remove items from your saved list to add more. Share A A A Elon Musk’s social network X has admitted breaking Australian law by failing to disclose the steps it was taking to combat child sexual exploitation material on its platform, ending a near three-year legal fight by conce

Full text

3,000 chars

X legal battle: Elon Musk’s platform to pay $650,000 penalty in Australia for failing to report on child safety Open accessibility guide Skip to sections navigation Skip to content Skip to footer Log in Our network Log in Expand navigation menu Search The Sydney Morning Herald logo The Sydney Morning Herald logo Advertisement Breaking Technology Child abuse Musk’s X admits breaking Australian child safety law, fined $650,000 David Swan May 21, 2026 — 11:55am Save You have reached your maximum number of saved items. Remove items from your saved list to add more. Share A A A Elon Musk’s social network X has admitted breaking Australian law by failing to disclose the steps it was taking to combat child sexual exploitation material on its platform, ending a near three-year legal fight by conceding to a $650,000 Federal Court penalty. In a brief hearing in Melbourne on Thursday, X’s lawyer conceded the contravention of the Online Safety Act. Christopher Tran, appearing for the eSafety Commissioner told the court “the respondent admits that it contravened the Act” and that there was “ongoing noncompliance for some 38 days”. Musk has previously levelled a slew of public insults at the regulator, labelling her an “unelected bureaucrat” and the “eSafety Commissar”, rhetoric that Inman Grant has said resulted in her receiving death threats and the doxxing of her children. AP Justice Michael Wheelahan ordered the company – which Musk acquired for $US44 billion in 2022 and folded into SpaceX earlier this year, ahead of a planned trillion-dollar float – to pay $650,000 in penalties and $100,000 to cover the regulator’s legal costs. In his ruling , Justice Wheelahan stated that a near-maximum penalty was necessary to act as a genuine deterrent for a corporation of X’s size. Advertisement The judge added that the public had “an interest in the commissioner seeking and obtaining a public declaration of contravention, which will contribute to a deterrent effect”, describing reporting requirements as an essential aspect of enforcing Australia’s basic online safety expectations. The proceedings stem from a transparency notice issued by eSafety in February 2023, when the regulator demanded information from US tech giants about how they were tackling child sexual exploitation and abuse material on their services in Australia. eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant. Alex Ellinghausen According to court filings, X failed to respond, or failed to respond truthfully and accurately, to more than two dozen separate questions, covering matters ranging from the detection of child grooming and livestreaming of abuse to response times for user reports and the deployment of safety-focused engineering staff. After issuing a $610,500 infringement notice in October 2023, the regulator was forced into protracted litigation when X refused to pay and instead launched a judicial review, arguing it could not be held to account for actions taken by Twitter before the platform’s rebrand.

More on this subject

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.