ruthfullyyours.com: https://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2026/05/19/the-abcs-gaza-fantasyland-part-ii-tony-thomas/

Speaker: —
Subject: K000376
Source: GDELT news · original
Published: Tuesday, May 19, 2026

The ABC’s Gaza Fantasyland: Part II Tony Thomas | RUTHFULLY YOURS Subscribe RUTHFULLY YOURS THE RIGHT NEWS, FRONT AND CENTER The ABC’s Gaza Fantasyland: Part II Tony Thomas Posted By Ruth King on May 19th, 2026 https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/their-abc/the-abcs-gaza-fantasyland-part-ii/ The 58-page report on the ABC’s pro-Palestine activism by a small group of Jewish analysts last week is an indictment of the national broadcaster. See Part One here . The report has been submitted to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism. This article continues coverage of detail in the report. The analysts conclude the ABC’s deeply rooted, anti-Israel (anti-Zionist) position plausibly vilified the IDF, Israel and, by extension, Jews, and fuelled hostility towards all those who support Israel. The effe

Full text

3,000 chars

The ABC’s Gaza Fantasyland: Part II Tony Thomas | RUTHFULLY YOURS Subscribe RUTHFULLY YOURS THE RIGHT NEWS, FRONT AND CENTER The ABC’s Gaza Fantasyland: Part II Tony Thomas Posted By Ruth King on May 19th, 2026 https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/their-abc/the-abcs-gaza-fantasyland-part-ii/ The 58-page report on the ABC’s pro-Palestine activism by a small group of Jewish analysts last week is an indictment of the national broadcaster. See Part One here . The report has been submitted to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism. This article continues coverage of detail in the report. The analysts conclude the ABC’s deeply rooted, anti-Israel (anti-Zionist) position plausibly vilified the IDF, Israel and, by extension, Jews, and fuelled hostility towards all those who support Israel. The effect, their report says, was to legitimise hate against Jewish Australians who feel a deep personal connection to Israel and its right to exist as a peaceful and pluralistic Jewish homeland. Hamas and its proxies have conducted an extensive global disinformation campaign against Israel. The ABC’s editorial approach appeared wilfully blind to this. The ABC distortions include ♦ Amplified harmful and unverified content without proportional evidentiary scrutiny. ♦ Publication of demonstrably false or highly contested claims as established facts. ♦ Emotional framing replacing factual analysis and operational context. ♦ Using sensational or accusatory headlines, with contextual qualifications buried deep in the article ♦ Presenting one-sided storytelling, in which Israeli perspectives, military context and security considerations were marginalised or omitted. ♦ Relying on politicised or structurally biased sources without adequate critical examination. ♦ Elevating ideologically committed commentators as neutral “experts”. ♦ The daily repeating of terms such as “genocide”, “famine” and “starvation” without meeting the rigorous legal and evidentiary thresholds. The cumulative effect of daily exposure to such framing is not public information but a form of indoctrination, normalising the perception of Israel as a pariah state and rendering suspicion or hostility toward its supporters socially acceptable. When extreme characterisations are normalised through daily repetition, they influence public discourse and narrow the boundaries of acceptable opinion. The result has been an environment in which Jewish Australians who openly support Israel are increasingly portrayed as perpetrators of alleged crimes against humanity. In such a climate, hostility becomes easier to justify and antisemitic sentiment more readily rationalised… The sheer scale of the journalistic failures and demonstrated bias… contributed directly to radicalisation in society and intensified militant antisemitism across Australia. Sajid and Naveed Akram [allegedly] pulled the trigger [at Bondi]. But the ideological climate that enables such violence is shaped over years by persistent narratives, repetition,

More on this subject

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.