HR 1792 — South Pacific Tuna Treaty Act of 2023
Congress 118
Latest action: — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Sponsors (0)
No sponsorships on file.
Action timeline (19)
- · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- · Intro-H — Introduced in House
- · 1000 — Introduced in House
- — Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries.
- — Subcommittee Hearings Held.
- — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
- — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- — Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries Discharged.
- · H12410 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 354.
- · H12200 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 118-429.
- · 5000 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 118-429.
- · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- · H37300 — On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2157-2158)
- · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2157-2158)
- · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1792.
- · H30000 — Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2157-2159)
- · H30300 — Ms. Hageman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Text versions (4)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- Shark Conservation and Management in the United States
R48951· Reports · 2026-05-19Shark conservation and management in the United States have received attention from stakeholders and Congress due to biological, aesthetic, human safety, and other factors related to sharks. Stakeholders have discussed i
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | R48951 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
Who matters on this bill
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-23 · Cited in GAO report R48951 · crs-report-relatedMaterials