browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 1824Supporting Disabled National Guardsmen Act

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-03-04

Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  2. · H11100 Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  3. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  4. · 1000 Introduced in House
  5. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 2 inbound, 0 outbound, grouped by type.

cosponsor of bill (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
Davis, Donald G.cosponsorsponsorship
sponsor of bill (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-03-04Bice, Stephanie I.sponsorsponsorship

The full graph

Every typed relationship touching this entity — 2 edges across 1 category. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.

Legislation

Cosponsored bill 1 edge

Sponsored bill 1 edge

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Bice, Stephanie I. (R, house OK-5)sponsor27
2Davis, Donald G. (D, house NC-1)cosponsor76

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1not employed0$0359$491,075$491,075
2self employed0$095$157,267$157,267
3retired0$044$31,003$31,003
4self-employed0$013$22,391$22,391
5coinbase0$02$21,000$21,000
6charles and lynn schusterman family ph0$02$21,000$21,000
7loves0$01$13,500$13,500
8pivotal ventures0$01$10,550$10,550
9bessemer venture partners0$01$10,500$10,500
10the baupost group0$01$10,500$10,500
11anduril industries, inc.0$02$10,500$10,500
12jane street capital0$02$10,500$10,500
13sagesure0$01$10,500$10,500
14sutherland capital management0$01$10,500$10,500
15tawani enterprises inc.0$01$10,500$10,500
16c2 strategies0$01$10,500$10,500
17paloma partners advisors lp0$01$10,400$10,400
18crowne partners inc0$03$10,000$10,000
19cornerstone government affairs0$09$9,000$9,000
20bancfirst0$01$8,500$8,500
21love's travel stops0$01$8,500$8,500
22s-3 group0$04$7,500$7,500
23sun capital partners0$01$7,500$7,500
24fierce government relations0$01$7,500$7,500
25meritage group lp0$01$7,000$7,000

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

2 predicted yes (0%) · 3 predicted no (1%) · 538 unknown (99%)

By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 1 yes / 0 no / 262 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

2 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Davis, Donald G. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2025-03-04 · sponsored by Bice, Stephanie I. (sponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.