HR 4276 — To amend the Native American Tourism and Improving Visitor Experience Act to authorize grants to Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and Native Hawaiian organizations, and for other purposes.
Congress 119 · introduced 2025-07-02
Latest action: — Subcommittee Hearings Held
Action timeline (8)
- · H11100 — Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- · H11100 — Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- · H11100 — Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- · Intro-H — Introduced in House
- · B00100 — Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E641)
- · 1000 — Introduced in House
- — Referred to the Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs.
- — Subcommittee Hearings Held
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in House · 2025-07-02 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Case, Ed (D, house HI-1) | sponsor | 4 | — | 9 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | not employed | 0 | $0 | 44 | $46,700 | $46,700 |
| 2 | washington harbour partners | 0 | $0 | 5 | $17,500 | $17,500 |
| 3 | anduril industries | 0 | $0 | 2 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 4 | self | 0 | $0 | 10 | $9,600 | $9,600 |
| 5 | moran global strategies | 0 | $0 | 5 | $8,000 | $8,000 |
| 6 | texas crude energy llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,500 | $7,500 |
| 7 | raft | 0 | $0 | 2 | $7,250 | $7,250 |
| 8 | cape | 0 | $0 | 2 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 9 | bessemer venture capital | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 10 | mz advising, llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 11 | dowling company, inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 12 | icebreaker strategies | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 13 | raft llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 14 | avalon group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 15 | hunt companies, inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 16 | silbey strategies | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 17 | trident research llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 18 | govly | 0 | $0 | 1 | $6,000 | $6,000 |
| 19 | van scoyoc associates | 0 | $0 | 6 | $5,500 | $5,500 |
| 20 | cornerstone government affairs | 0 | $0 | 11 | $5,250 | $5,250 |
| 21 | work now hawaii | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| 22 | fenix space | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| 23 | nan inc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| 24 | us house of representatives | 0 | $0 | 1 | $4,000 | $4,000 |
| 25 | groundswell | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
1 predicted yes (0%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 262 unknown (48%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 1 yes / 0 no / 262 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Case, Ed (D · house · HI-1) · sponsor