browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 5051To require members of the Armed Forces performing active service in the District of Columbia in response to an order of the President which relates to crime or civil disturbance in the District of Columbia to participate in a program substantially similar to the Body-Worn Camera Program of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-08-26

Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Sponsors (1)
Action timeline (4)
  1. · H11100 Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
  2. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  3. · B00100 Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E789)
  4. · 1000 Introduced in House
Text versions (1)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.

cosponsor of bill (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
Thanedar, Shricosponsorsponsorship
referred to committee (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-01-03House Armed Services Committeecongress-committee
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Thanedar, Shri (D, house MI-13)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1not employed0$012$16,017$16,017
2sterling group0$05$15,000$15,000
3self0$05$13,000$13,000
4eastpointe radiology0$01$7,804$7,804
5detroit pistons0$01$7,000$7,000
6businesses. owners0$01$7,000$7,000
7premier oncology hematology0$01$5,500$5,500
8rand merchant bank0$01$3,750$3,750
9tpmg0$01$3,500$3,500
10globaltekforcecom0$01$3,500$3,500
11barq impex usa inc0$01$3,500$3,500
12votech educational systems inc.0$01$3,500$3,500
13self employed0$01$3,500$3,500
14new hope medical centers0$01$3,500$3,500
15balance sleep centers of mississippi0$01$3,500$3,500
16none0$01$3,500$3,500
17quality inn0$01$3,000$3,000
18retired0$03$2,500$2,500
19the scion group0$01$2,000$2,000
20linwood realty, inc.0$01$2,000$2,000
21honigman llp0$02$2,000$2,000
22aei0$01$2,000$2,000
23honigman0$02$2,000$2,000
24butzel long0$01$2,000$2,000
25ramvel0$01$1,500$1,500
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

1 predicted yes (0%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 262 unknown (48%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 1 yes / 0 no / 262 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Thanedar, Shri (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Armed Services Committee · congress-committee
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.