HR 7344 — Affordable Housing Supply Chain Clarity Act
Congress 119 · introduced 2026-02-04
Latest action: — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Action timeline (3)
- · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- · Intro-H — Introduced in House
- · 1000 — Introduced in House
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in House · 2026-02-04 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- Housing for the 21st Century Act
R48849· Reports · 2026-05-07The Housing for the 21st Century Act (H.R. 6644) was passed by the House on February 9, 2026. The bill contains six titles comprising 38 sections, which address several housing policy topics as well as several banking to
Connected on the graph
2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | R48849 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
cosponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ← | Bera, Ami | — | cosponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bera, Ami (D, house CA-6) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | not employed | 0 | $0 | 86 | $83,510 | $83,510 |
| 2 | self | 0 | $0 | 16 | $18,193 | $18,193 |
| 3 | western health advantage | 0 | $0 | 2 | $7,500 | $7,500 |
| 4 | skk developments | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 5 | westbridge | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 6 | urban elements | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 7 | uc davis | 0 | $0 | 4 | $6,750 | $6,750 |
| 8 | minnesota urology | 0 | $0 | 15 | $6,500 | $6,500 |
| 9 | koreana plaza market oakland inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,500 | $5,500 |
| 10 | self-employed | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,300 | $5,300 |
| 11 | n/a | 0 | $0 | 11 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| 12 | fulcrum property group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $4,708 | $4,708 |
| 13 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 4 | $4,700 | $4,700 |
| 14 | black davis group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 15 | molecule ventures | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 16 | rahd group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 17 | lilette advisors | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 18 | beekman advisors inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 19 | oracle corporation | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 20 | jk strategies | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 21 | legislative intent services inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,000 | $3,000 |
| 22 | blackwatch international llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
| 23 | bellwether government affairs | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
| 24 | green mountain strategies llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
| 25 | cornerstone government affairs | 0 | $0 | 5 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
1 predicted yes (0%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 262 unknown (48%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 1 yes / 0 no / 262 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Bera, Ami (D · house · CA-6) · cosponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-23 · Cited in GAO report R48849 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Bera, Ami (cosponsor) · sponsorship