HR 7887 — ACCESS Act
Congress 118
Latest action: — On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 178 - 234 (Roll no. 380).
Sponsors (0)
No sponsorships on file.
Action timeline (12)
- · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
- · Intro-H — Introduced in House
- · 1000 — Introduced in House
- — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
- — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- · H37220 — At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 7887.
- · H30000 — Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4711-4712; text: CR H4711)
- · H30300 — Ms. Mace moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- · H37300 — On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 178 - 234 (Roll no. 380).
- · 9000 — Failed of passage/not agreed to in House On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 178 - 234 (Roll no. 380).
- · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4797-4798)
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in House · 2024-04-09 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- Suspension of the Rules: House Practice in the 118th Congress (2023-2024)
R48650· Reports · 2025-08-27Suspension of the rules is the most commonly used procedure to call up measures on the floor of the House of Representatives. As the name suggests, the procedure allows the House to suspend its standing and statutory rul
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | R48650 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
Who matters on this bill
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
152 predicted yes (28%) · 378 predicted no (70%) · 13 unknown (2%)
By party: · R: 152 yes / 120 no / 5 unknown · D: 0 yes / 255 no / 8 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no
50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50
- Adams, Alma S. (D · house · NC-12) · voted
- Aderholt, Robert B. (R · house · AL-4) · voted
- Aguilar, Pete (D · house · CA-33) · voted
- Alford, Mark (R · house · MO-4) · voted
- Allen, Rick W. (R · house · GA-12) · voted
- Amo, Gabe (D · house · RI-1) · voted
- Amodei, Mark E. (R · house · NV-2) · voted
- Arrington, Jodey C. (R · house · TX-19) · voted
- Auchincloss, Jake (D · house · MA-4) · voted
- Babin, Brian (R · house · TX-36) · voted
- Bacon, Don (R · house · NE-2) · voted
- Baird, James R. (R · house · IN-4) · voted
- Balderson, Troy (R · house · OH-12) · voted
- Balint, Becca (D · house · VT) · voted
- Banks, Jim (R · senate · IN) · voted
- Barr, Andy (R · house · KY-6) · voted
- Barragán, Nanette Diaz (D · house · CA-44) · voted
- Bean, Aaron (R · house · FL-4) · voted
- Beatty, Joyce (D · house · OH-3) · voted
- Bentz, Cliff (R · house · OR-2) · voted
- Bera, Ami (D · house · CA-6) · voted
- Bergman, Jack (R · house · MI-1) · voted
- Beyer, Donald S. (D · house · VA-8) · voted
- Bice, Stephanie I. (R · house · OK-5) · voted
- Biggs, Andy (R · house · AZ-5) · voted
- Bilirakis, Gus M. (R · house · FL-12) · voted
- Bishop, Sanford D. (D · house · GA-2) · voted
- Blunt Rochester, Lisa (D · senate · DE) · voted
- Boebert, Lauren (R · house · CO-4) · voted
- Bonamici, Suzanne (D · house · OR-1) · voted
- Bost, Mike (R · house · IL-12) · voted
- Boyle, Brendan F. (D · house · PA-2) · voted
- Brecheen, Josh (R · house · OK-2) · voted
- Brown, Shontel M. (D · house · OH-11) · voted
- Brownley, Julia (D · house · CA-26) · voted
- Buchanan, Vern (R · house · FL-16) · voted
- Budzinski, Nikki (D · house · IL-13) · voted
- Burchett, Tim (R · house · TN-2) · voted
- Burlison, Eric (R · house · MO-7) · voted
- Calvert, Ken (R · house · CA-41) · voted
- Cammack, Kat (R · house · FL-3) · voted
- Carbajal, Salud O. (D · house · CA-24) · voted
- Carey, Mike (R · house · OH-15) · voted
- Carson, André (D · house · IN-7) · voted
- Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" (R · house · GA-1) · voted
- Carter, John R. (R · house · TX-31) · voted
- Carter, Troy A. (D · house · LA-2) · voted
- Casar, Greg (D · house · TX-35) · voted
- Case, Ed (D · house · HI-1) · voted
- Casten, Sean (D · house · IL-6) · voted
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report R48650 · crs-report-relatedMaterials