HR 8450 — Phosphate and Potash Protection Act of 2024
Congress 118
Latest action: — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 680.
Sponsors (1)
- Cammack, Kat (R, FL-3) — sponsor · 2024-05-17
Action timeline (11)
- · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- · Intro-H — Introduced in House
- · 1000 — Introduced in House
- — Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
- — Subcommittee Hearings Held
- — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Voice Vote.
- — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- — Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Discharged
- · H12410 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 680.
- · H12200 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 118-833.
- · 5000 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 118-833.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- The U.S. Mining Industry and the Rosemont Decision
R48166· Reports · 2024-08-26The General Mining Act of 1872 (Mining Act) formed the bedrock of U.S. mining policy during westward expansion in the 19th century. The law remains in effect. Among other provisions, it allows parties to explore for and
Connected on the graph
2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | R48166 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
sponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-17 | ← | Cammack, Kat | — | sponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cammack, Kat (R, house FL-3) | sponsor | 3 | — | 8 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | none | 0 | $0 | 218 | $90,568 | $90,568 |
| 2 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 33 | $52,503 | $52,503 |
| 3 | gleim publications | 0 | $0 | 3 | $17,500 | $17,500 |
| 4 | mehlman consulting | 0 | $0 | 3 | $9,000 | $9,000 |
| 5 | doctors imaging group llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 6 | epic | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| 7 | tillis farms llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| 8 | bgr group | 0 | $0 | 2 | $4,500 | $4,500 |
| 9 | kirkland ellis | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 10 | jones edmunds associates inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 11 | vobile inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 12 | klein johnson group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 13 | dimare homestead inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 14 | campus usa credit union | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 15 | pivotal ventures | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 16 | john c hipp construction co | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 17 | davis and sons construction | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,500 | $3,500 |
| 18 | daniels manufacturing corp. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,300 | $3,300 |
| 19 | a10 associates | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,300 | $3,300 |
| 20 | gwinn brothers llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,850 | $2,850 |
| 21 | the petrizzo group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,750 | $2,750 |
| 22 | robinhood markets | 0 | $0 | 2 | $2,416 | $2,416 |
| 23 | campaign engine | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,100 | $2,100 |
| 24 | right voter llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,100 | $2,100 |
| 25 | science corporation | 0 | $0 | 1 | $2,000 | $2,000 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
1 predicted yes (0%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 276 unknown (51%)
By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Cammack, Kat (R · house · FL-3) · sponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report R48166 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2024-05-17 · sponsored by Cammack, Kat (sponsor) · sponsorship