HR 9474 — Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2024
Congress 118
Latest action: — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors (1)
- Kiley, Kevin (I, CA-3) — sponsor · 2024-09-06
Action timeline (3)
- · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- · Intro-H — Introduced in House
- · 1000 — Introduced in House
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in House · 2024-09-06 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- Science and Technology Issues for the 119th Congress
R48482· Reports · 2026-04-02Science and technology (S&T) underlie a wide range of issues confronting the nation. The advancement of S&T can drive economic growth, help address national priorities, and improve health and quality of life. The ubiquit
Connected on the graph
2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | R48482 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
sponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | ← | Kiley, Kevin | — | sponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kiley, Kevin (I, house CA-3) | sponsor | 2 | — | 7 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | retired | 0 | $0 | 742 | $549,243 | $549,243 |
| 2 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 95 | $120,274 | $120,274 |
| 3 | homemaker | 0 | $0 | 11 | $22,200 | $22,200 |
| 4 | dreisbach enterprises | 0 | $0 | 2 | $14,000 | $14,000 |
| 5 | wealth in overdrive | 0 | $0 | 1 | $11,500 | $11,500 |
| 6 | none | 0 | $0 | 4 | $10,950 | $10,950 |
| 7 | outback materials | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 8 | irell manella llp | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 9 | reliable cadillac | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 10 | odin construction solutions | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 11 | a16z | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 12 | noonan family swim school | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 13 | allworth financial | 0 | $0 | 2 | $9,300 | $9,300 |
| 14 | pacific ceramics inc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $8,000 | $8,000 |
| 15 | pacfic coast companies | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 16 | deacon construction | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 17 | olympic valley fire | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 18 | quest technology | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 19 | reynen & bardis homes, inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 20 | gallelli real estate | 0 | $0 | 2 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 21 | ripple labs inc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 22 | mge | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 23 | guaranty finance management | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 24 | armored works | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 25 | healing rooms smv | 0 | $0 | 2 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
3 predicted yes (1%) · 540 predicted no (99%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 3 yes / 0 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Kiley, Kevin (I · house · CA-3) · sponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-23 · Cited in GAO report R48482 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2024-09-06 · sponsored by Kiley, Kevin (sponsor) · sponsorship