browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 1061 — Providing for the concurrence by the House in the Senate amendment to H.R. 4366, with an amendment.

Congress 118

Latest action: — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors (0)

No sponsorships on file.

Action timeline (10)
  1. · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  2. · H37300 — On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 339 - 85 (Roll no. 64). (text: CR H842-961)
  3. · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 339 - 85 (Roll no. 64). (text: CR H842-961)
  4. · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H971)
  5. · H37220 — At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
  6. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 1061.
  7. · H30000 — Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H842-969)
  8. · H30300 — Ms. Granger moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
  9. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  10. · 1000 — Introduced in House
Text versions (1)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (2)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 2 outbound, grouped by type.

cited in report (2)
datedirentityamountrolesource
—→R48650—crs-report-relatedMaterials
—→R41003—crs-report-relatedMaterials
Who matters on this bill
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

291 predicted yes (54%) · 248 predicted no (46%) · 4 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 111 yes / 163 no / 3 unknown · D: 179 yes / 83 no / 1 unknown · I: 1 yes / 2 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50
Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report R48650 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
  2. 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report R41003 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.