browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 1287 — Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8070) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2025 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year; relating to the consideration of House Report 118-527 and an accompanying resolution; and for other purposes.

Congress 118

Latest action: — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors (1)
Action timeline (14)
  1. · H12420 — Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 82.
  2. · H12700 — The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8070 under a structured rule and the resolution accompanying House Report 118-527 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 8070.
  3. · H12100 — The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-551, by Mr. Scott, Austin.
  4. · 5000 — The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-551, by Mr. Scott, Austin.
  5. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  6. · 1000 — Introduced in House
  7. · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  8. · H37100 — On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 207 (Roll no. 251). (text: CR H3730-3731)
  9. · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 207 (Roll no. 251). (text: CR H3730-3731)
  10. · H35000 — On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 204 (Roll no. 250).
  11. · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3737-3738)
  12. · H8D000 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1287, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Scanlon demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  13. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1287.
  14. · H30000 — Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3730-3736)
Text versions (2)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.

cited in report (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
—→IN12405—crs-report-relatedMaterials
sponsor of bill (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2024-06-11←Scott, Austin—sponsorsponsorship
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Scott, Austin (R, house GA-8)sponsor0—5

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1none0$020$36,000$36,000
2self employed0$026$23,050$23,050
3daniel defense0$02$17,500$17,500
4fickling & company, inc0$01$14,000$14,000
5grid raster inc.0$01$10,500$10,500
6herb realty0$01$7,000$7,000
7hennessy automobile0$01$7,000$7,000
8cross potomac consulting0$01$7,000$7,000
9mclendon acres, inc0$01$5,000$5,000
10united obstetrics and gynecology0$01$3,500$3,500
11lowndes county0$01$3,500$3,500
12howard center for women health0$01$3,500$3,500
13c6 strategies0$01$3,500$3,500
14shilon pecan farms inc0$01$3,500$3,500
15j.a. green & co.0$01$3,300$3,300
16prince automotive0$02$2,750$2,750
17mrs homecare inc.0$01$2,500$2,500
18the langdale company0$01$2,500$2,500
19ashley's business solutions0$01$2,500$2,500
20eleanor crook foundation0$01$2,500$2,500
21h2 capital, inc.0$01$2,500$2,500
22teramore development, llc0$01$2,500$2,500
23parrish construction group0$01$2,500$2,500
24yoss platform0$01$2,500$2,500
25sigma defense0$01$2,286$2,286
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

362 predicted yes (40%) · 439 predicted no (48%) · 112 unknown (12%)

By party: · R: 360 yes / 0 no / 103 unknown · D: 0 yes / 437 no / 9 unknown · I: 2 yes / 2 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50
Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report IN12405 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
  2. 2024-06-11 · sponsored by Scott, Austin (sponsor) · sponsorship
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.