SB 422 — Senate Bill 422 of 2025
MI 2025 session · introduced 2025-06-12
Sponsors (8)
- Jonathan Lindsey (R, MI-17) — sponsor
- Kevin Daley (R, MI-26) — cosponsor
- Joseph N. Bellino Jr. (R, MI-16) — cosponsor
- Michael Webber (R, MI-9) — cosponsor
- Dan Lauwers (R, MI-25) — cosponsor
- Roger Hauck (R, MI-34) — cosponsor
- Edward W. McBroom (R, MI-38) — cosponsor
- Roger Victory (R, MI-31) — cosponsor
Action timeline (2)
- · senate — INTRODUCED BY SENATOR JONATHAN LINDSEY
- · senate — REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS AND ETHICS
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jonathan Lindsey (R, state_upper MI-17) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Dan Lauwers (R, state_upper MI-25) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Edward W. McBroom (R, state_upper MI-38) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Joseph N. Bellino Jr. (R, state_upper MI-16) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Kevin Daley (R, state_upper MI-26) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Michael Webber (R, state_upper MI-9) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Roger Hauck (R, state_upper MI-34) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | Roger Victory (R, state_upper MI-31) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no