LB 830 — Change and eliminate provisions relating to the payment of state salaries, the use of deferred maintenance funds, and county payments for state institutions
NE 109 session
Change and eliminate provisions relating to the payment of state salaries, the use of deferred maintenance funds, and county payments for state institutions
Sponsors (1)
- Dan Lonowski (OTHER, NE-33) — sponsor
Action timeline (8)
- · unicameral — Date of introduction
- · unicameral — Kauth FA459 filed
- · unicameral — Referred to Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee
- · unicameral — Notice of hearing for January 30, 2026
- · unicameral — Government, Military and Veterans Affairs AM2362 filed
- · unicameral — Placed on General File with AM2362
- · unicameral — Provisions/portions of LB830 amended into LB1048 by AM2739
- · unicameral — Indefinitely postponed
Text versions (1)
- Introduced — PDF
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
referred to committee (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | Government, Military and Veterans Affairs | — | ne-leg-action |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dan Lonowski (OTHER, unicameral NE-33) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · was referred to Government, Military and Veterans Affairs · ne-leg-action