S 2626 — Strengthening United States Leadership at the IDB Act
Congress 119 · introduced 2025-07-31
Latest action: — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 240.
Sponsors (1)
- McCormick, David (R, PA-S) — sponsor · 2025-07-31
Action timeline (6)
- — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
- · 10000 — Introduced in Senate
- — Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 240.
- — Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- · 14000 — Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 0 outbound, grouped by type.
sponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-31 | ← | McCormick, David | — | sponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCormick, David (R, senate PA) | sponsor | 1 | — | 6 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | retired | 0 | $0 | 3,104 | $939,865 | $939,865 |
| 2 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 248 | $159,896 | $159,896 |
| 3 | constellation | 0 | $0 | 31 | $30,500 | $30,500 |
| 4 | blackrock | 0 | $0 | 11 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| 5 | homemaker | 0 | $0 | 26 | $23,574 | $23,574 |
| 6 | pond lehocky | 0 | $0 | 1 | $23,500 | $23,500 |
| 7 | upmc | 0 | $0 | 15 | $22,816 | $22,816 |
| 8 | bny | 0 | $0 | 5 | $15,200 | $15,200 |
| 9 | cdl nuclear technologies | 0 | $0 | 3 | $15,000 | $15,000 |
| 10 | apollo | 0 | $0 | 4 | $15,000 | $15,000 |
| 11 | constellation energy | 0 | $0 | 18 | $14,520 | $14,520 |
| 12 | american discovery capital | 0 | $0 | 1 | $13,500 | $13,500 |
| 13 | excalibur insurance | 0 | $0 | 1 | $13,500 | $13,500 |
| 14 | manifest energy inc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $13,500 | $13,500 |
| 15 | govini | 0 | $0 | 9 | $13,302 | $13,302 |
| 16 | robinhood markets | 0 | $0 | 2 | $12,000 | $12,000 |
| 17 | love's travel stops | 0 | $0 | 2 | $10,000 | $10,000 |
| 18 | pga | 0 | $0 | 1 | $9,800 | $9,800 |
| 19 | sweetstreet | 0 | $0 | 1 | $9,358 | $9,358 |
| 20 | bae systems land & armaments lp | 0 | $0 | 11 | $9,000 | $9,000 |
| 21 | armada sunset holdings | 0 | $0 | 1 | $8,992 | $8,992 |
| 22 | jpmorgan chase | 0 | $0 | 4 | $8,750 | $8,750 |
| 23 | bae systems | 0 | $0 | 10 | $8,604 | $8,604 |
| 24 | march capital | 0 | $0 | 1 | $8,500 | $8,500 |
| 25 | oak view group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $8,327 | $8,327 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
1 predicted yes (0%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 276 unknown (51%)
By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- McCormick, David (R · senate · PA) · sponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2025-07-31 · sponsored by McCormick, David (sponsor) · sponsorship