browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

S 3056Combatting the Persecution of Religious Groups in China Act

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-10-27

Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Sponsors (3)
Action timeline (2)
  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
  2. · 10000 Introduced in Senate
Text versions (1)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Connected on the graph

4 typed relationships in the influence graph — 3 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.

cosponsor of bill (3)
datedirentityamountrolesource
Ricketts, Petecosponsorsponsorship
Tillis, Thomascosponsorsponsorship
Sullivan, Dancosponsorsponsorship
referred to committee (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-01-03Senate Foreign Relations Committeecongress-committee
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Ricketts, Pete (R, senate NE)cosponsor96
2Tillis, Thomas (R, senate NC)cosponsor23
3Sullivan, Dan (R, senate AK)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$0817$832,913$832,913
2pearson & associates0$0106$225,754$225,754
3self-employed0$0105$180,207$180,207
4self employed0$072$102,728$102,728
5homemaker0$039$94,780$94,780
6s-3 group0$040$80,350$80,350
7holtzman vogel, pllc0$018$62,100$62,100
8self0$038$56,264$56,264
9u.s. travel association0$07$46,790$46,790
10kirkland & ellis llp0$05$38,500$38,500
11bp0$012$31,200$31,200
12cumberland development0$01$28,000$28,000
13apollo0$07$24,300$24,300
14echostar0$03$24,000$24,000
15not employed0$09$23,750$23,750
16blackstone0$02$21,000$21,000
17perceptive advisors0$01$21,000$21,000
18apollo global management0$06$20,700$20,700
19corning0$018$19,500$19,500
20clean energy0$014$19,000$19,000
21unemployed0$011$18,000$18,000
22elliott investment management0$01$17,700$17,700
23mountaire0$02$17,500$17,500
24castle harlan, inc.0$01$17,500$17,500
25skybox capital0$01$17,500$17,500
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

3 predicted yes (1%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 274 unknown (50%)

By party: · R: 3 yes / 0 no / 274 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

3 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Ricketts, Pete (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Sullivan, Dan (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Tillis, Thomas (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2025-01-03 · was referred to Senate Foreign Relations Committee · congress-committee
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.