S 4367 — Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024
Congress 118
Latest action: — Became Public Law No: 118-272.
Sponsors (1)
- Kelly, Mark (D, AZ-S) — cosponsor
Action timeline (36)
- — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- · 10000 — Introduced in Senate
- — Committee on Environment and Public Works. Committee consideration held.Business Meeting printed. S. Hrg. 118-719.
- — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 401.
- — Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Carper with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- · 14000 — Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Carper with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- — Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- — Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- · 17000 — Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- — The committee substitute withdrawn by Unanimous Consent.
- — Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S5724-5746)
- — Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- · H15000 — Held at the desk.
- · H14000 — Received in the House.
- — By Senator Carper from Committee on Environment and Public Works filed written report. Report No. 118-227.
- · 14900 — By Senator Carper from Committee on Environment and Public Works filed written report. Report No. 118-227.
- · H37220 — At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 4367.
- · H30000 — Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6453-6529)
- · H30300 — Mr. Graves (MO) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- · H37300 — On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 399 - 18 (Roll no. 493). (text: 12/9/2024 CR H6453-6525)
- · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 399 - 18 (Roll no. 493). (text: 12/9/2024 CR H6453-6525)
- · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6555-6556)
- — Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.
- — Senate agreed, under the order of 12/12/2024, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, to the House amendment to S. 4367 by Yea-Nay Vote. 97 - 1. Record Vote Number: 327.
- · 20500 — Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed, under the order of 12/12/2024, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, to the House amendment to S. 4367 by Yea-Nay Vote. 97 - 1. Record Vote Number: 327.
- — Motion by Senator Carper to concur in the House Amendment to S. 4367 made in Senate.
- — Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
- — Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- · E20000 — Presented to President.
- · 28000 — Presented to President.
- · E40000 — Became Public Law No: 118-272.
- · 36000 — Became Public Law No: 118-272.
- · E30000 — Signed by President.
- · 36000 — Signed by President.
Text versions (6)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (3)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- Economic Development Reauthorization Act (EDRA) of 2024
R48516· Reports · 2025-04-17The U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) and active federal regional commissions and authorities (FRCAs) administer numerous federal economic development programs that support workforce training, disaster econo - Water Resources Development Acts: Primer and Action in the 118th Congress
IF11322· Resources · 2025-01-14The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is a Department of Defense agency that, among other missions, develops water resource projects, principally to improve navigable channels, reduce flood and storm damage, and resto - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works: FAQs on Organization and Efficiency Reviews
R48322· Reports · 2025-01-07The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), within the Department of Defense (DOD), is a public engineering organization with both civil works and military functions. What Are USACE’s Civil Works Roles? USACE’s principal
Connected on the graph
4 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 3 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (3)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | IF11322 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials | |
| — | → | R48322 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials | |
| — | → | R48516 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
cosponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ← | Kelly, Mark | — | cosponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kelly, Mark (D, senate AZ) | cosponsor | 2 | — | 3 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | not employed | 0 | $0 | 25,511 | $7,577,772 | $7,577,772 |
| 2 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 1,991 | $716,992 | $716,992 |
| 3 | retired | 0 | $0 | 327 | $182,720 | $182,720 |
| 4 | self | 0 | $0 | 15 | $16,125 | $16,125 |
| 5 | g.g. greene enterprises, inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $14,000 | $14,000 |
| 6 | mass general hospital | 0 | $0 | 2 | $13,750 | $13,750 |
| 7 | the wonderful company | 0 | $0 | 2 | $13,200 | $13,200 |
| 8 | marian, inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $11,500 | $11,500 |
| 9 | 0 | $0 | 20 | $11,391 | $11,391 | |
| 10 | university of arizona | 0 | $0 | 38 | $10,834 | $10,834 |
| 11 | field hands productions | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 12 | icg | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 13 | flagship pioneering | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,250 | $10,250 |
| 14 | concord servicing corp. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,000 | $10,000 |
| 15 | transdigm group | 0 | $0 | 2 | $10,000 | $10,000 |
| 16 | reglagene, inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,000 | $10,000 |
| 17 | meredith management | 0 | $0 | 2 | $9,000 | $9,000 |
| 18 | grossman company properties | 0 | $0 | 2 | $8,850 | $8,850 |
| 19 | arizona state university | 0 | $0 | 21 | $7,872 | $7,872 |
| 20 | slogoods properties, llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,400 | $7,400 |
| 21 | northwestern university | 0 | $0 | 3 | $7,240 | $7,240 |
| 22 | healthyup, inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 23 | phoenix art museum | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 24 | charlesbank capital partners | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 25 | cooper moose farm | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
433 predicted yes (80%) · 61 predicted no (11%) · 49 unknown (9%)
By party: · R: 211 yes / 61 no / 5 unknown · D: 219 yes / 0 no / 44 unknown · I: 3 yes / 0 no
50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50
- Adams, Alma S. (D · house · NC-12) · voted
- Aderholt, Robert B. (R · house · AL-4) · voted
- Aguilar, Pete (D · house · CA-33) · voted
- Alford, Mark (R · house · MO-4) · voted
- Allen, Rick W. (R · house · GA-12) · voted
- Amo, Gabe (D · house · RI-1) · voted
- Amodei, Mark E. (R · house · NV-2) · voted
- Arrington, Jodey C. (R · house · TX-19) · voted
- Auchincloss, Jake (D · house · MA-4) · voted
- Babin, Brian (R · house · TX-36) · voted
- Bacon, Don (R · house · NE-2) · voted
- Baird, James R. (R · house · IN-4) · voted
- Balderson, Troy (R · house · OH-12) · voted
- Baldwin, Tammy (D · senate · WI) · voted
- Balint, Becca (D · house · VT) · voted
- Banks, Jim (R · senate · IN) · voted
- Barr, Andy (R · house · KY-6) · voted
- Barragán, Nanette Diaz (D · house · CA-44) · voted
- Barrasso, John (R · senate · WY) · voted
- Bean, Aaron (R · house · FL-4) · voted
- Beatty, Joyce (D · house · OH-3) · voted
- Bennet, Michael F. (D · senate · CO) · voted
- Bentz, Cliff (R · house · OR-2) · voted
- Bera, Ami (D · house · CA-6) · voted
- Bergman, Jack (R · house · MI-1) · voted
- Beyer, Donald S. (D · house · VA-8) · voted
- Bice, Stephanie I. (R · house · OK-5) · voted
- Biggs, Andy (R · house · AZ-5) · voted
- Bilirakis, Gus M. (R · house · FL-12) · voted
- Bishop, Sanford D. (D · house · GA-2) · voted
- Blackburn, Marsha (R · senate · TN) · voted
- Blumenthal, Richard (D · senate · CT) · voted
- Blunt Rochester, Lisa (D · senate · DE) · voted
- Boebert, Lauren (R · house · CO-4) · voted
- Bonamici, Suzanne (D · house · OR-1) · voted
- Booker, Cory A. (D · senate · NJ) · voted
- Boozman, John (R · senate · AR) · voted
- Bost, Mike (R · house · IL-12) · voted
- Boyle, Brendan F. (D · house · PA-2) · voted
- Brecheen, Josh (R · house · OK-2) · voted
- Britt, Katie Boyd (R · senate · AL) · voted
- Brown, Shontel M. (D · house · OH-11) · voted
- Brownley, Julia (D · house · CA-26) · voted
- Buchanan, Vern (R · house · FL-16) · voted
- Budd, Ted (R · senate · NC) · voted
- Budzinski, Nikki (D · house · IL-13) · voted
- Burchett, Tim (R · house · TN-2) · voted
- Burlison, Eric (R · house · MO-7) · voted
- Calvert, Ken (R · house · CA-41) · voted
- Cammack, Kat (R · house · FL-3) · voted
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report IF11322 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report R48322 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report R48516 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Kelly, Mark (cosponsor) · sponsorship