S 4818 — Safeguarding Americans From Extremist Risk (SAFER) at the Border Act
Congress 118
Latest action: — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors (1)
- Schmitt, Eric (R, MO-S) — cosponsor
Action timeline (2)
- — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- · 10000 — Introduced in Senate
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in Senate · 2024-07-25 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (1)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
- Immigration Parole
R46570· Reports · 2025-09-18The parole provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) gives the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) discretionary authority to “parole into the United States temporarily under such conditio
Connected on the graph
2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cited in report (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | R46570 | — | crs-report-relatedMaterials |
cosponsor of bill (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ← | Schmitt, Eric | — | cosponsor | sponsorship |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schmitt, Eric (R, senate MO) | cosponsor | 2 | — | 3 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | retired | 0 | $0 | 9,779 | $1,087,802 | $1,087,802 |
| 2 | edward jones | 0 | $0 | 18 | $40,000 | $40,000 |
| 3 | blackstone | 0 | $0 | 4 | $33,500 | $33,500 |
| 4 | pgi insurance | 0 | $0 | 19 | $27,221 | $27,221 |
| 5 | apollo global management | 0 | $0 | 7 | $26,300 | $26,300 |
| 6 | homemaker | 0 | $0 | 55 | $25,653 | $25,653 |
| 7 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 300 | $25,557 | $25,557 |
| 8 | self-employed | 0 | $0 | 35 | $22,683 | $22,683 |
| 9 | torch electronics | 0 | $0 | 2 | $21,000 | $21,000 |
| 10 | hunter engineering company | 0 | $0 | 2 | $17,500 | $17,500 |
| 11 | research affiliates | 0 | $0 | 2 | $16,300 | $16,300 |
| 12 | gme alliance | 0 | $0 | 2 | $14,000 | $14,000 |
| 13 | todd strategy group | 0 | $0 | 3 | $13,500 | $13,500 |
| 14 | nu cybertek inc. | 0 | $0 | 8 | $10,944 | $10,944 |
| 15 | elliott investment management | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 16 | mercy international | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 17 | wcas | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 18 | ozarks coca-cola | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 19 | apollo asset management | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 20 | palantir technologies | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 21 | jc2 ventures | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 22 | journatic llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 23 | mortgage research center | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 24 | portfolio manager | 0 | $0 | 1 | $10,500 | $10,500 |
| 25 | fierce government relations | 0 | $0 | 2 | $8,000 | $8,000 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
1 predicted yes (0%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 276 unknown (51%)
By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Schmitt, Eric (R · senate · MO) · cosponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · Cited in GAO report R46570 · crs-report-relatedMaterials
- 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Schmitt, Eric (cosponsor) · sponsorship