browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SRES 321A resolution commemorating 30 years of diplomatic relations between the United States and Vietnam on July 11, 2025.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-07-15

Latest action: Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S8892-8893)

Sponsors (0)

No sponsorships on file.

Action timeline (7)
  1. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4371-4372)
  2. · 10000 Introduced in Senate
  3. Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S8892-8893)
  4. · 17000 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent.
  5. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S8891-8893)
  6. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent.
  7. · 14500 Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Text versions (2)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments

Amendments (2)

Floor amendments proposed to this bill. Source: govinfo.gov BILLSTATUS XML, amendments.amendment[]. Newest first by amendment number. Per-amendment actions and vote rolls land via the bill-status ingest as upstream publishes them.

AmendmentSponsorIntroducedLatest actionPurpose
S.Amdt. 4141Merkley, Jeff (D-OR)2025-12-182025-12-18 · Amendment SA 4141 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.To amend the preamble.
S.Amdt. 4140Merkley, Jeff (D-OR)2025-12-182025-12-18 · Amendment SA 4140 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.In the nature of a substitute.
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Who matters on this bill
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.