browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SRES 459A resolution honoring the strategic importance of the C5+1 diplomatic platform and recognizing the deepening partnership between the United States and the nations of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-10-21

Latest action: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7905; text: CR 10/21/2025 S7188)

Sponsors (1)
Action timeline (6)
  1. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
  2. · 10000 Introduced in Senate
  3. Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7905; text: CR 10/21/2025 S7188)
  4. · 17000 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
  5. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent.
  6. · 14500 Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Text versions (2)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.

cosponsor of bill (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
McCormick, Davidcosponsorsponsorship
referred to committee (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-01-03Senate Foreign Relations Committeecongress-committee
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1McCormick, David (R, senate PA)cosponsor12

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$03,104$951,465$951,465
2self employed0$0248$159,896$159,896
3constellation0$031$30,500$30,500
4blackrock0$011$25,000$25,000
5homemaker0$026$23,574$23,574
6pond lehocky0$01$23,500$23,500
7upmc0$015$22,816$22,816
8bny0$05$15,200$15,200
9apollo0$04$15,000$15,000
10cdl nuclear technologies0$03$15,000$15,000
11constellation energy0$018$14,520$14,520
12excalibur insurance0$01$13,500$13,500
13american discovery capital0$01$13,500$13,500
14manifest energy inc0$01$13,500$13,500
15govini0$09$13,302$13,302
16robinhood markets0$02$12,000$12,000
17love's travel stops0$02$10,000$10,000
18pga0$01$9,800$9,800
19sweetstreet0$01$9,358$9,358
20bae systems land & armaments lp0$011$9,000$9,000
21armada sunset holdings0$01$8,992$8,992
22jpmorgan chase0$04$8,750$8,750
23bae systems0$010$8,604$8,604
24march capital0$01$8,500$8,500
25oak view group0$01$8,327$8,327
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

1 predicted yes (0%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 276 unknown (51%)

By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by McCormick, David (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2025-01-03 · was referred to Senate Foreign Relations Committee · congress-committee
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.